Sam and Mike

When it comes to the assassination saga, there are many remarkable individuals.  There are several men and women who stand on their own in the drama that occurred in 1865.  As students of the assassination though, there are also many people (and aspects of their stories) that we have joined together.  There are names and experiences that we have come to almost automatically associate together as a set or a pair.  The Lincoln’s guests that fateful evening, Major Henry Rathbone and Clara Harris, are one such couple that, by virtue of engagement and tragedy, are forever linked together as a pair.  Louis Weichmann and John Lloyd, as the chief witnesses again Mary Surratt in the trial, share a legacy in books and a recent movie.  John Wilkes Booth and David Herold are linked due to their shared twelve day escape.

In addition to these and many others we have created, two men tried during the summer months of 1865 are interconnected.  Though strangers until that fateful year, Samuel Arnold and Michael O’Laughlen, are now rarely spoken of as individuals.  Rather, Sam and Mike are a pair.

Both knew John Wilkes Booth when they were children.  Both joined Maryland regiments in the Confederate army.  Both left military service early.  Both agreed to aid John Wilkes Booth in his kidnapping plot.  Both lost interest and split with Booth before the plot turned to assassination, and both were sentence by the military tribunal to life imprisonment at FortJefferson.  They shared such similar lives, it makes sense that one would invoke the other.  After reading over accounts of the time that these two men spent together when in the employ of Booth and their subsequent incarceration, one cannot help but imagine a friendship that must have grown between the two men.  While all the conspirators started as strangers to each other, spokes connected by the hub of John Wilkes Booth, Sam and Mike appear to share the same values and life experiences that would produce a true friendship.  The shared imprisonment would lead to a friendship between Dr. Mudd and Edman Spangler as well, but, in my eyes, Sam and Mike’s had a stronger foundation.

One discrepant piece of information towards a strong friendship between Sam and Mike is Sam Arnold’s own memoirs.  As was previously written, Sam Arnold released his memoirs after a different Sam Arnold died and the newspapers reported his own death.  In these memoirs he recounts his involvement with Booth and gives graphic descriptions of his time at FortJefferson.  In Michael Kauffman’s edited book of Arnold’s memoirs, he succinctly points out a large anomaly in the narrative:

“The most striking omission is the absence of any comment on the case of his cellmate, Michael O’Laughlen.  Arnold ignores him so completely that in telling about the end of the yellow fever epidemic , Arnold writes that, ‘happily, we lived through it all,” when, in fact, O’Laughlen had died from the disease.”

While Arnold’s account was written many years after O’Laughlen’s death, the omission of so much regarding him is odd.  In truth, it throws a bit of a monkey wrench in my whole, “They were good friends,” hypothesis.  If I lost a close, albeit rather recent, friend in jail, I would probably write about him.  In the end, I still maintain they two shared a bond of friendship due to a brief mention in an article regarding the other Sam Arnold’s death.

The October 9, 1902, Baltimore American ran an article correcting the misconception that the conspirator Sam Arnold had died.  In it, they attempted to find out where the real Sam Arnold was.  During their search they reported the following regarding Sam’s life:

“When he came back from his island prison, off the Florida coast, he brought with him a number of mementoes of one of his fellow prisoners from Baltimore, who had died of fever, to the latter’s brother here.  This brother said yesterday that he had not seen or heard from “Sam Arnold” for at least 15 years, and he was reasonably sure he had not been in Baltimore during that time.”

So while Dr. Mudd was the man who attended to Mike on his deathbed and Spangler was the one Mike said his last goodbye to, it was Sam Arnold who returned Mike’s effects to his brother Samuel Williams O’Laughlen.  To me, that shows a deep friendship.  Sam wanted to connect with the family of his lost friend and bring them some comfort.

Though O’Laughlen’s brother stated he hadn’t heard from Arnold in 15 years that still means Arnold was in contact with the O’Laughlen family into the 1880’s.  Friends do that.  They keep in touch with the family and they share memories long after a loved one has passed.

In my view, the absence of Mike’s death in Sam’s memoirs does not display coldness.  I choose to believe that Sam was deeply affected by Mike’s passing.  I choose to believe that the two men shared a strong, emotional bond that kept Arnold from publicly expressing his grief at his friend’s death.  Mike is avoided in Sam’s memoirs, not because he meant nothing to him, but because he meant a great deal.

While my views on Sam and Mike’s friendship are merely my personal opinion, there is nevertheless a connection between these two men.  They shared so much in life, that we have appropriately linked them together.  When a discussion of the conspirators arises, the name of one man will almost inevitably follow the other.  It appears that Sam and Mike will be associated together more than any other two conspirators,  and they fittingly rest in peace in the same cemetery for all time.

References:
Memoirs of a Lincoln Conspirator by Samuel Bland Arnold edited by Michael Kauffman
Baltimore American – “Death Recalls Great Tragedy” 10/9/1902

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , , | 3 Comments

Surratt’s Wanted Photo

A few days ago Roger Norton left the following comment on this blog:

“Dave, please excuse going off topic.  But I am looking for a younger pair of eyes on this one.  On my Mary Surratt page at http://rogerjnorton.com/Lincoln26.html I have a photo identified as Isaac Surratt.  Basically it’s Laurie, Joan Chaconas, and I against the world on this one – do you think that is Isaac or is it really just another photo of John?  What do younger eyes see?  The one author I can find that agrees with Laurie, Joan, and me is Roy Chamlee.”

The picture Mr. Norton is referencing is John Surratt’s wanted poster photo:

The picture used in the wanted poster came from the Surratt boardinghouse after it was searched.

It has been proposed, as Roger states, that the picture is not of John but rather of his brother Isaac.  It’s a hard point to prove because while there are a few photos of John in his younger years to compare it to, there is only one known photograph of Isaac Surrat known to exist.  Still, it’s an interesting possibility and one worthy of dicussion.

So, what do you think? Does this wanted poster photo look more like John or Isaac? Post your views in the comment section below.  I’ll wait a while and then chime in with my opinion.

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: | 20 Comments

Junius and Jackson

Tragedian Junius Brutus Booth, Sr., and President Andrew Jackson

Did John Wilkes Booth’s father, Junius Brutus Booth, Sr., write a letter threatening President Andrew Jackson’s life?  PBS’ History Detectives investigate:

Click here to watch the “Booth Letter” episode on PBS.org

This episode features author Gene Smith.  Mr. Smith wrote a wonderful biography of the Booth family entitled, American Gothic: the Story of America’s Legendary Theatrical family, Junius, Edwin, and John Wilkes Booth.  I decided to post this video after learning the sad news that Mr. Smith passed away on July 25th.  His book was one of the first “Boothie” books I ever read, and it drew me more and more into the assassination story.  Thank you, Mr. Smith.

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , , | 7 Comments

We are now BoothieBarn.com!

In this month’s (August 2012) issue of the Surratt Courier the Surratt Society not only carried a revised version of my Michael O’Laughlen: Quilter article, but also endorsed this blog and Roger Norton’s forum. This is on top of their already kind mention on the Surratt.org website.

In the Courier, this site was listed as BoothieBarn.com. Up until now, that was incorrect as I had been using the free version of the WordPress blogging site. The mistake convinced me to finally take the plunge and purchase the BoothieBarn.com domain name. Looking at my site stats I knew that many others had found this site after searching for BoothieBarn.com so I feel it will be worth it.

Therefore, from now on, there are two ways to reach this site. The old address (https://boothiebarn.wordpress.com) will continue to work indefinitely. The newly created http://www.boothiebarn.com will work too. Both addresses will bring you to the same site and material. So if you have this site already bookmarked you could change it to BoothieBarn.com but you don’t really have to.

As BoothieBarn.com, I hope I’ll be able to continue to provide interesting articles for your reading pleasure.

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: | 1 Comment

George Robinson’s Grave

Just a quick post today as I’m still in the process of getting set up in my new Maryland residence.

During a brief site seeing trip I took with two of my family members who helped me make the move from Illinois, we visited Arlington National Cemetery. I have been there before, but every time I visit it I am still humbled by the white, uniformed acres of sacrifice before me.

One grave related to the Lincoln assassination in Arlington belongs to George Foster Robinson.

20120806-115912.jpg

On April 14th, 1865, Robinson was an army private tending to Secretary of State William Seward after the latter suffered a carriage accident. When Lewis Powell slashed his way into Seward’s bed chamber, it was largely Robinson who discharged him. He was credited as saving the Secretary’s life and was given many accolades. Robinson would receive Powell’s knife as a memento, be presented with a gold congressional medal and $5,000, and, 100 years later, a mountain in Alaska was named after him for saving the man who later purchased the territory of Alaska from Russia.

Today he rests in Arlington next to his wife Roxinda Aurora:

20120806-121442.jpg

The Robinsons are located just a stone’s throw from Bobby and Teddy Kennedy’s graves. In the background of the pictures you can see the large white fence that currently shields Teddy Kennedy’s grave. So next time you’re at Arlington make the minor detour into the section in front of the Kennedy brother’s and pay your respects to a true Civil War hero: George Foster Robinson.

20120806-122557.jpg

References:
http://www.eighthmaine.com/Pages/OurHero.aspx
http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/gfrobinson.htm

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , | 2 Comments

The Actors Repent

When John Wilkes Booth assassinated Abraham Lincoln at Ford’s Theatre, he not only stigmatized the Booth name for all time, but he also set back the entire profession of acting.  While today actors are celebrated, and many are viewed as members of high social standing, this was not the case in 1865.  Actors were seen by many as vagrants akin to gypsies.  While audiences would celebrate and applaud talented actors, they would not socialize publicly with them.  While some progress had been made with actors like Edwin Booth gaining acceptance in esteemed social circles, most of the populace still saw actors and their profession in an unfavorable light.  After Lincoln was shot and it was determined that the wound was fatal, the doctors moved him to the Petersen house so that he would not have the shame of dying in a theatre.

After the assassination, many of the actors and crew from Ford’s Theatre, probably worried about the future of their careers and occupation, met together and drafted resolutions to make it clear to the public that they did not support the actions of their fellow actor, John Wilkes Booth.  On April 24, 1865, the Daily National Republican ran the following article:

Resolutions of the Theatrical Profession Respecting the Assassination of the President –

At a meeting of members of the theatrical profession now sojourning in Washington, Wednesday, April 19, 1865, the following preamble and resolutions were unanimously adopted:

Whereas the fact being indisputably proved that our beloved lae President, Abraham Lincoln, was assassinated in a most wanton and brutal manner on the night of the 14th of April, 1865, by a fiend named John Wilkes Booth, who has used our profession as an instrument to the accomplishment of his horrible and inhuman design; Therefore

Resolved, That in the cruel murder of President Lincoln our country has lost its wisest defender and best and greatest citizen – greatest because best.

Resolved, That the Histrionic profession especially has cause for heart-fels mourning in the awful sacrifice of Mr. Lincoln, the good and kindly man of liberal mind, who, through genial patronage, was refining and popularizing the dramatic art.

Resolved, That disloyalty, under any guise, has not nor ever will be countenanced by our noble profession, whose members are to be found in the ranks of the Union army and whose hearts are always open to the appeals of charity

Resolved, That the undersigned do hereby pledge themselves to hold no friendly intercourse with any person, male or female, who has or shall give utterance to the least sympathy with secession, and that managers as well as artistes are invited to co-operate with us in this resolve.

Resolved, That we will wear a suitable badge of mourning for ninety days.

J. C. McCollom, George Wren, S. H. Verney,
Tom Hampton, H. B. Phillips, J. B. Wright,
J. W. Jennings, C. H. Clark, Wm. Barron,
G. G. Spear, Chas. Koppitz, Wm. Withers, Jr,
T. C. Gourlay, C. V. Hess, J. H. Evans,
G. A. Parkhurst, A. C. Green, D. A. Strong and
H. McDonall, W. J. Ferguson, J. Lamb, sc’c art.

Many who signed their names above would have to carry the association of that dreadful night forever.  In the end though, the public’s desire for entertainment trumped any retribution for Booth’s crime against acting as a whole.  The main acting related casualty from that night was John T. Ford’s beautiful theatre.  It was shut down and would not reopen as a theatre again until long after the generation that witnessed Lincoln’s death had, themselves, turned to dust.

References:
My Thoughts Be Bloody by Nora Titone

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , | 6 Comments

A Sketch of Seward’s Assassin

“Looking again to the right, and omitting the alternate guard, we come to one of the most remarkable faces of the group – a face which, once seen, may never be forgotten; on whose moral stature is readily determined by his face.  This man is clothed sparingly.  He is in his shirt sleeves – a sort of steel mixed woolen shirt; his pantaloons dark blue cloth; his neck bare and shirt collar unbuttoned.  He is fully six feet high; slender body; angular form; square and narrow across the shoulders; hollow breast; hair black, straight and irregularly cut and hanging indifferently about his forehead, which is rather low and narrow.  Blue eyes, large, staring, and at times wild, returning your look steadily and unflinchingly.  Square face; jaw irregular; nose turned at the top but expanding abruptly at the nostrils; thin lips, and slightly twisted; mouth curved unsymmetrically a little to the left of the middle line of the face; a wild, savage-looking man, bearing no culture or refinement – the most perfect type of the ingrained hardened criminal…” – Milwaukee Sentinel (05/16/1865)

For the time being all I can manage to post is this self created montage of Lewis Powell and a description of him from a period newspaper account. Of course Powell’s biographer, Betty Ownsbey, is the best source for information on Lewis Powell and happily discusses him on Roger Norton’s Lincoln Discussion Symposium.

I, myself, have been busy preparing for an upcoming move out of my home state of Illinois to the great state Maryland.  I recently got a new teaching job in Maryland and I am very excited about being closer to the history that I love.

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , , | 7 Comments

One Rough Romeo

John Wilkes Booth was well known for his devotion to the physicality of the characters he portrayed.  While his elocution of Shakespearian parts required additional training, audiences would still come out in droves to witness Booth leap and fight with unbridled passion.  It was Booth’s energy that made him a star.  Even Edwin remarked at his brother’s ability by stating, “When time and study round his rough edges he’ll bid them all ‘stand apart.’” Edwin paraphrases a line from Richard II that states, “Stand all apart, and show fair duty to his majesty” displaying his belief that his brother had the makings to be a prince of the stage as well.

Nevertheless, John’s vigor proved trying to many of the actors and actresses with whom he shared the stage.  Catherine Reignolds-Winslow, an actress who played with John Wilkes in Boston, wrote of him in her memoirs:

“As an actor he had more of the native fire and fury of his great father than any of his family, but he was as undisciplined on the stage as off.  When he fought, it was no stage fight.  If his antagonist did not strain his nerve and skill, he would either be forced over the stage into the orchestra as happened, I believe, once or twice; or cut and hurt, as almost always happened.  He told me that he generally slept smothered in steak or oysters to cure his own bruises after Richard the Third, because he necessarily got as good as he gave, – in fact more, for though an excellent swordsman, in his blind passion he constantly cut himself. How he threw me about! Once even knocked me down, picking me up again with a regret as quick as his dramatic impulse had been vehement. In Othello, when, with, fiery remorse, he rushed to the bed of Desdemona after the murder, I used to gather myself together and hold my breath, lest the bang his cimeter gave when he threw himself at me should force me back to life with a shriek.

The sharp dagger seemed so dangerous an implement in the hands of such a desperado that I lent him my own – a spring dagger, with a blunt edge, which is forced back into its handle if it is actually struck against an object. In the last scene of Romeo and Juliet, one night, I vividly recall how the buttons at his cuff caught my hair, and in trying to tear them out he trod on my dress and rent it so as to make it utterly useless afterward; and in his last struggle literally shook me out of my shoes! The curtain fell on Romeo with a sprained thumb, a good deal of hair on his sleeve, Juliet in rags and two white satin shoes lying in the corner of the stage!”

So, while Booth was known to be a heart breaker to the women he wooed off of the stage, it appears he was known as a bit of a bone breaker to those he encountered on it.

One interesting note in Catherine Reignolds-Winslow’s memoirs is the mention of her lending him a collapsible dagger.  A similar dagger from the Booth family and apparently used by John Wilkes once belonged to Dr. John Lattimer and was sold at auction in 2008.  If true, perhaps other leading ladies began requiring Booth to use such a prop in hopes that they might avoid further harm at his hands.

References:
My Thoughts Be Bloody by Nora Titone
Yesterdays with Actors by Catherine Mary Reignolds-Winslow

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , | 3 Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.