Welcome to LincolnConspirators.com

This website is an educational resource exploring the history surrounding the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln. It is written by me, Dave Taylor, a historian and former elementary school teacher. This website is primarily a blog where I post new articles about various aspects of the Lincoln assassination story. My latest blog posts can be found directly underneath this one.

In addition to my normal blog posts, I have also completed a number of special projects and deep dives into certain parts of the tragedy of April 1865. I have created this pinned post to facilitate better access and awareness of these unique projects, which I hope will be explored by history students of all ages.

To check out the special projects and a collection of specially curated posts, click the image below. To read the newest blog posts, just keep on scrolling. If you like what you see and want to support the research, please consider becoming a patron on Patreon. Thanks for visiting!

Categories: Pinned post

“The Day Lincoln Was Shot” in Massapequa, NY, on 4/15/26

I have just been informed that on this coming Wednesday, April 15, 2026, Abraham Lincoln expert Richard Sloan will be hosting a rare public viewing of the 1956 CBS television special “The Day Lincoln Was Shot” at the Massapequa Public Library in Massapequa Park, New York (on Long Island). While I will be including this event in my weekly Lincoln assassination news and events dispatch on my Patreon tomorrow, I wanted to give this viewing a bit of wider attention. Last year, Richard conducted a similar showing of this rare drama from the Ford Star Jubilee program at the Lincoln Forum in Gettysburg. Here’s a photo from that presentation that the Lincoln Forum put on Instagram:

As you can see, Richard’s presentation was very well attended and, from reports I heard, very well received. This is no surprise, as Richard is an expert on depictions of Lincoln in movies and television. He has previously graced this website with an excellent article about different movie lobby cards featuring Lincoln.

I, for one, have never seen “The Day Lincoln Was Shot” due to its rarity and would jump at the chance to take in Richard’s showing if I could. If you’re lucky enough to be in the NYC region, make plans to be at the Massapequa Public Library at 2:00 pm on this Wednesday, April 15. You can register for this free event here.

And, if you’re interested in learning about more Lincoln assassination events going on around the world, sign up for the LincolnConspirators Patreon. For just $3 or more a month, you get a weekly newsletter keeping you apprised of Lincoln assassination news and upcoming programs.

Categories: History, News, Richard Sloan | Tags: , , , | Leave a comment

Lincoln Assassination Tours Reviews

On Saturday, March 14, 2026, Lincoln Assassination Tours took its first bus-load of participants over the escape route and manhunt for John Wilkes Booth. We had a lovely group representing Washington, D.C., Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Florida, Arizona, and California. I was especially delighted by our 93-year-old guest, who had last taken a Booth escape tour in 1985 and was very excited to share the experience with his granddaughter. Despite a hiccup with the bus’s microphone system that forced me to use my teacher voice for the next nine hours, it was a perfect day of history and site exploration. I’m very grateful to my tour supervisors, Jen Taylor and Bob Bowser, and our bus driver, Charles, for making this day run so well.

At the end of the tour, I asked the participants to provide feedback and to leave us reviews on Google and TripAdvisor, if they felt so inclined. We also had photographer Jim Dresbach on the tour to snap pictures of the group at our various stops. I have taken a sampling of the feedback we received and Jim’s pictures and created a new page on the Lincoln Assassination Tours website called Reviews. On that page, you can read testimonials from participants, look through our reviews, and check out some pictures from this first outing of many.

While at the time of this posting, we only have single tickets left for our April 18 and April 19 tours, I am in the planning stages for our proposed fall tour dates. I hope to announce our September and October dates as soon as we complete our spring tours.

In the meantime, check out our new page of Reviews to see what real particpants have to say about their time on a Lincoln Assassination Tour.

Categories: Lincoln Assassination Tours | 1 Comment

The Avenger and the Actor by Steven G. Miller

The avenger of Abraham Lincoln, Boston Corbett, and actor William Holston

The Avenger and the Actor:

Did Sgt. Boston Corbett have an actor in his family in 1865?

By Steven G. Miller

The news of Lincoln’s assassination came as a blow to many groups, both North and South, but none, perhaps, took it as hard as the theatre community. The assassin was “one of theirs” and a well-known member of the famous family of the stage. There were threats made against theatres, and actors rightly feared for their personal safety. Playhouses in Washington were closed immediately for fear of retribution, but the shock and taint of possible association with Lincoln’s killer also caused theatre owners in the country’s largest city, New York, to shut their doors temporarily.

Theatre historian Thomas Allston Brown’s 1870 History of the American Stage reported that: “The assassination of President Abraham Lincoln occurred April 14. At a meeting of the managers of the New York theatres the following day, it was decided to close all places of amusement until Wed., April 26.”[1]

Of course, the Manhattan managers had no way of knowing that Wilkes Booth would be captured and killed on the very day they planned to reopen. In a bit of irony worthy of Shakespeare, the curtains went back up on Broadway a few hours after the assassin played out his final scene. Actors could now get back to work, but still with one wary eye on the mood of their audience.

The news broke on the 27th that Booth was dead and that the shooter, Sergt. Boston Corbett was a resident of New York City in his civilian life. On the following day, a small item appeared in the (New York) Evening Post in their entertainment news. This blurb combined a connection between the reopening of Wallack’s and the man who shot Lincoln’s assassin.

The Post stated:

“Mr. (William) Holston, lately of the Olympic Theatre, has left that establishment, and been engaged at Wallack’s, where he will appear Wednesday night. Mr. Holston, by the way, is the cousin of that loyal soldier, Sergeant Boston Corbett, who shot the assassin Booth and is equally with him an admirer of the late President.”[2]

This snippet was overlooked in the deluge of news about the death of the president, the search for Booth, and the subsequent trial of the Conspirators. It was only recently rediscovered, and this is likely the first mention of it in over 160 years.

Who was the actor Holston?

William Holston (Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery)

William Holston was a comedian and character actor who was gaining popularity in America in 1865. He was born in Camden, England, in 1830. Stage historian Brown wrote of him in 1870:

“HOLSTON, WILLIAM—This English actor made his debut in London, Eng. Sept. 15, 1856 at the Lycian Theatre as Blocus in “Perdita, or the Royal Milkmaid,” he came to America and appeared with considerable success at the Olympic and afterwards at Wallacks’ Theatre. Returned to England, where he is at present.”[3]

Was Holston related to Sgt. Boston Corbett? If so, how?

In March 1865, Boston’s father, Bartholomew Corbett, who was living in London, wrote a tribute to his older sister, Elizabeth, who had recently died. This piece was widely reprinted, usually under the headline, “An Extraordinary Yorkshire Woman.” Of the eighty-plus reprintings of this article – throughout the British Isles, various parts of the Empire, or American cities like New York, Chicago, and Boston – the author of the piece is usually not identified. In one, however, he is: Her obituary lists her as, “ELIZABETH HOLSTON (maiden name Corbett, sister of the naturalist, late of 61 Piccadilly).” 61. Piccadilly was the long-time location of “Corbett’s Natural History Museum.”[4]

My research into the Corbett family shows that Elizabeth Corbett married a tailor named James William Holston, who preceded her in death. The actor, however, was her grandson. His parents were James W. Holston, Jr., and his wife, Harriet. William Holston’s grandmother was Boston Corbett’s aunt. In other words, William Holston was Boston Corbett’s first cousin once removed.[5]

Were Boston and William in contact?

This is unclear, but it’s highly unlikely that they were. Obviously, William was aware of his cousin, and they were both in Manhattan between 1865 and 1870, but there is no mention of Holston in any of Corbett’s papers or any additional newspaper articles.

Corbett’s puritanical attitude would have made any communication uncomfortable, at best. His beliefs were discussed in an untitled article in the Cincinnati Enquirer, October 7, 1886. It referred to “a letter Boston Corbett is said to have written to an old comrade who had proposed to give a public entertainment upon an intense episode of the civil war.” “Keep out of the theater,” writes Corbett to his friend. “If Lincoln had never gone to the theater he would not have lost his life. Most of those who go there lose life, and soul, too.”

Another obvious question arises: Did Holston appear on stage with any members of the Booth family? There is no evidence he did, but Holston was in an 1870 performance in Baltimore which was co-produced by Edwin and Wilkes’ brother-in-law, John Sleeper Clarke. The New York theatrical paper, the Clipper, reported it:

“Of Baltimore Dramatic Affairs,” New York Clipper, March 26, 1870.

“Our correspondent, under date of March 18th, thus discourses: — Manager Ford, of the Holliday Street Theatre, has been delighting his patrons during the week with the resumption of specie payment and a trip to the great city of London at a very nominal charge. The “Lights and Shadows of the Great City of London,” as witnessed by so many Baltimoreans up to date, consists of a series of paintings of high excellence and fidelity to nature, executed by John Johnson, of London, and illustrating the prominent public buildings, squares, bridges, etc., of that metropolis. In conjunction with these views is a thrilling and emotional drama, the joint production of Henry Leslie, of London, and John S. Clarke, of Baltimore. The cast, an unusually strong one, is as follows: . . . William Holston, of England (first appearance), as Ralph Heron.”

Was Sleeper aware of the connection? Did Bos’ know of it? Is the answer buried out there in a newspaper archive waiting to be ferreted out? We may never know.

Just as a matter of interest, I became curious as to what Holston might have been up to on April 14th and 15th. Was he in preparation for the opening of the play at Wallack’s? Or, was he already engaged? It turns out that Holston was performing at The Olympic, as hinted at in the notice of his family connection to Sergt. Corbett. Both the Tribune and the Daily Herald mentioned it.

The blurb in the Tribune on April 15th said:

“Olympic Theater. “London Assurance” will be represented this afternoon for the least time at the Olympic during the present season. In the evening Mr. W. Holston’s benefit will take place. He is announced to appear in two parts which have elsewhere gained him much reputation—those of Jabe Bunny in “Black Sheep” and Daddy Hardacre, in the piece of the same name.”

An advertisement in the Daily Herald of the 14th lists a Saturday matinee for “London Assurance” and the evening “benefit of Mr. Holston.” Undoubtedly, the Saturday performances were cancelled, and Mr. Holson’s benefit, which would depend on ticket sales, was another victim of Booth’s attack. Perhaps he found some small comfort in knowing that a relative was responsible for killing the assassin responsible for the crime perpetrated on the American nation, Holston’s profession, and his personal finances.

What happened to Holston after 1865?

Holston travelled between America and England between the years 1865 and 1874. He appeared on the stage in New York, London, Newark, NJ, Springfield, MA, and Liverpool.

In 1874, he joined a theatre troupe that travelled to India for a series of engagements.[6] While there, unfortunately, his health took a dramatic turn for the worse. The record of what happened is not clear. He returned to England to recuperate, and on August 26, 1875, the New York Tribune reported:

“Mr. William Holston—an actor who won many admirers by his comical eccentricity when he was at Wallack’s—has been dangerously ill in Calcutta. He is now in retirement after a perilous surgical operation; but hopes are entertained that he will recover his health.”

His health did not get better, however, and he died on January 21, 1876. The Liverpool Intelligence lamented, “Mr. William Holston, well known both to metropolitan and provincial theatre goers as an excellent actor in character died in London last Friday.”[7]

Conclusion:

From the evidence that has surfaced, it appears that Boston Corbett, the soldier who shot Lincoln’s assassin, was related to William Holston, an actor who was scheduled to appear on stage in New York City in April 1865. Holston’s premier was delayed by the tragic news that Lincoln had been attacked in a theatre by a well-known actor. William Holston was the first cousin once removed to Corbett, and let it slip to a drama reporter that he was connected to the avenger. Later on, Holston appeared in a play that was stage-managed by Booth’s brother-in-law, John Sleeper Clarke. Holston doesn’t appear to have mentioned the connection to Cousin Boston again and, perhaps, wisely chose not to reveal his relationship to members of the Booth family.


[1] Brown, Thomas Allston, History of the American Stage; Consisting of Biographical Sketches of Nearly Every Member of the Profession that has appeared on the American Stage from 1733 to 1870. NY: Dick and Fitzgerald, 1870, pg. 255.
[2] Untitled, New York Post, April 28, 1865.
[3] Brown, ibid., pg. 182.
[4] “Obituary,” Morning Examiner (London, England), March 11, 1865.
[5] Bartholomew Corbett (1781-1866) and Elizabeth (Corbett) Holston (1772-1865) were siblings. Thomas (later, Boston) was the 4th of 5 children born to Bartholomew and Elizabeth (Wild) Corbett. Elizabeth (Corbett) Holston and her husband, James Holston (1781-1857), had 3 children. Their son, James William Holston (1810-?), was the father of William Holston (1830-1876), the actor. In other words, the actor was the first cousin once removed to Boston/Thomas Corbett.
The preceding information was gleaned from Ancestry.com, FamilySearch, and the records of Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn, among other sources. Much of the material was published in Miller, Steven G., “Pursuing the Mysterious Family of Thomas (Boston) Corbett,” Lincoln Herald, Volume 118, Number 4, Winter, 2016.
Note: It’s tricky to keep all of the members of the family who were named Elizabeth straight. For instance, Boston (Thomas) was the son of Elizabeth Corbett. His aunt was Elizabeth (Corbett) Holston, and Boston even had an older sister named Elizabeth!
[6] An article titled “The Rise and Fall of the Calcutta Stage,” by “Mr. Dangle,” appeared in The Theatre magazine, Vol 1, No. 1, page 90. It discussed the efforts to bring a theatre company to India during 1874 and later. Called “The Corinthian Theatre Company,” it was organized by Mr. G. B. W. Lewis. The upshot of it was that “Mr. E. English arrived in Calcutta with a comedy and burlesque company, (which) contained the following artists… William Holston.”
[7] “Death Mr. Wm. Holston,” Liverpool Intelligence, January 26, 1876.— Mr. William Holston, well known both to metropolitan and provincial theatre goers as an excellent actor in character died in London last Friday.”

My deepest thanks to my friend Steve Miller for this excellent piece. You’re the best, Mr. Steve.

Categories: History, Steven G. Miller | Tags: , , | 7 Comments

The Many Coats of Abraham Lincoln with Reignette Chilton

When Abraham Lincoln was assassinated at Ford’s Theatre, he was wearing two coats. His outer layer was a custom greatcoat from the celebrated clothier Brooks Brothers. President Lincoln originally wore this greatcoat with the phrase “One Country, One Destiny” embroidered on the inside at his second inauguration, just a month before his murder. In 2019, researcher and author Reignette Chilton published a book called Lincoln’s Greatcoat: The Unlikely Odyssey of a Presidential Relic. In that book, Ms. Chilton documented the greatcoat’s journey from being a private possession of a White House doorkeeper’s family to a national treasure that long greeted visitors upon their entrance to Ford’s Theatre.

In January of 2026, Ms. Chilton released a new book delving into the other coat Lincoln wore on the fateful night of April 14, 1865. Beneath the elaborate Brooks Brothers greatcoat, Lincoln wore a regular suit coat, known as a frock coat. In the over 160 years since his death, three different frock coats have become associated with the tragedy at Washington. They exist in the collections of the Smithsonian, Ford’s Theatre, and the Chicago History Museum. But which is THE coat Lincoln was wearing when the fatal bullet was fired? In Lincoln’s Frock Coat: The Enduring Mystery of an Assassination Relic, Ms. Chilton dives deep into each frock coat and the evidence behind the claims. The journeys of these frock coats involve members of the Lincoln family, trusted White House staff, noted artists, wealthy collectors, auctioneers, lawyers, and more, as supporters of two of the coats fought bitterly to be recognized as the true assassination relic. It’s a historical mystery expertly solved through primary sources and comprehensive analysis.

I was fortunate to conduct a virtual interview with Reignette Chilton to discuss her background, research, and fascinating books, with an emphasis on the mysterious Lincoln frock coats. Reignette had so many interesting stories to share that we talked for over an hour and a half, and even then, we only scratched the surface of these relics. I hope you enjoy the interview.

If this interview has whetted your appetite for more (and I hope it has), go out and buy or borrow Lincoln’s Frock Coat: The Enduring Mystery of an Assassination Relic to learn which coat deserves to be called the last frock coat Lincoln ever wore.

Categories: History, News | Tags: , , , , , | 4 Comments

Lincoln Assassination Tours Update

In October, I announced the launch of Lincoln Assassination Tours, my own venture to restart the John Wilkes Booth escape route bus tours that I used to narrate for the Surratt Society before COVID-19 brought them to an end. Since that time, I’ve been blown away by the support of so many of you who follow this blog. While I knew there was still a demand to join the manhunt for Lincoln’s assassin, I wasn’t sure whether a new business focused on such a specialized tour could break through and find its audience. That is why I am so pleased to announce that Lincoln Assassination Tours has reached the minimum participant threshold for our first tour on March 14, 2026. This means that our inaugural tour is officially confirmed!

We’re going to have a great time in March chasing John Wilkes Booth over his escape route through D.C., Maryland, and Virginia. I’m thankful to everyone who has purchased tickets for this tour and for our subsequent tours planned for Saturday, April 18, and Sunday, April 19.

I’m indebted to my wonderful site partners who have helped to spread the word about the tours.

  • The Surratt House Museum in Clinton, Maryland, has endorsed the tour on the Prince George’s County History Facebook page and kindly provides space for our advertising cards and bookmarks in their visitor center.
  • The Dr. Samuel A. Mudd House Museum in Waldorf, Maryland, likewise displays our cards in their gift shop (see image below) and has written about us on their Facebook page.
  • The Historical Society of Charles County (the operators of the newest museum on the route, Rich Hill) has been so supportive of our efforts, emailing its membership about the tours and posting several times on its Facebook page. We’ll be getting some cards into their hands when we visit Rich Hill in March.
  • Even though the Booth family home of Tudor Hall in Harford County, Maryland, isn’t on the tour, they have some of our marketing material on hand for when they open up again for their own tours and talks in the spring. Click the link to check out their impressive lineup of speakers for 2026.
  • The folks at Explore Charles County have been great. They have added our tours to their community calendar and display our cards in the county’s welcome center off of Route 301.
  • The Surratt Society graciously mentioned Lincoln Assassination Tours in the September/October 2025 edition of the Surratt Courier.

Lincoln Assassination Tours cards on display in the gift shop of the Dr. Samuel A. Mudd House Museum

While meeting the minimum threshold for the March tour is a reason to celebrate, I’m now focused on making sure our two tours in April go forward. We still have over two months of sales to go before we reach the “make-or-break” cut-off date for minimum participants for the April tours. I’m still hopeful we will get enough sales to run both tours, but I would be eternally grateful for your help in getting them over the line. Word of mouth is really the best way to help a new business get on its feet, especially one as specialized as this. Please, if you’re so inclined to help, tell your friends, family members, and social circles about Lincoln Assassination Tours. Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Bluesky. If you follow this blog, I know you’ll find those pages just as interesting. I regularly post information about the tours and the Lincoln assassination in general. “Liking” and sharing our posts on those platforms can really help extend our reach.

While Lincoln Assassination Tours is a business, profit is not my goal. I am an educator who taught elementary grades for 12 years. As the narrator for the Surratt Society tours, I truly loved taking people down the escape route of the assassin and teaching them about this momentous event in history. The goal of Lincoln Assassination Tours is to teach a new generation about the death of Abraham Lincoln. The minimum participant threshold does not include any profit; it merely covers the costs associated with operating the tour. At this moment, for example, the March tour count just covers the expenses, and there is no profit to be had. While I would love to sell out a whole bus, I’m just as happy doing the March tour for the smallest possible number of people, because I truly love giving the tour and sharing the experience with others.

I hope you’ll consider registering for one of our April tour dates. At the end of this post, I’ll include hyperlinked images to where you can purchase your tickets. Even if you previously took the Booth escape tour with the Surratt Society, Smithsonian, or another group, I can assure you that there is something new to experience on a Lincoln Assassination Tour. Our tours are the first to include a stop in the brand-new museum of Rich Hill in Charles County, Maryland. Our narration not only describes the movement of the assassin and his accomplices, but also the everyday people who crossed paths with this momentous event and the scores of manhunters who sought justice for the President. Each Lincoln Assassination Tour will end with a free raffle where a lucky participant (or two) will walk away with a book about Lincoln’s assassination. And, of course, all participants will receive a coveted Lincoln’s Avengers sticker and Lincoln Assassination Tours bookmark for successfully tracking down John Wilkes Booth.

I promise I won’t always be asking for help like this, but the success of these spring tours is crucial to ensuring they can continue for years to come. My hope is that these first few tours will lead to positive reviews and allow me to record more tour-specific content to help grow a wider audience. They will also help me gain valuable experience to refine the tour process across booking, marketing, and execution. Essentially, being able to run three tours this spring will set us up for continued success going forward.

If you have already purchased a ticket for a Lincoln Assassination Tour, you have my deepest thanks. It’s because of you all that a new group will be able to experience this fascinating tour and momentous time in history firsthand on March 14. For those who haven’t bought tickets but have been thinking about it, I’d love to have you join us for our tours on Saturday, April 18, or Sunday, April 19. These tours will take place just days after the anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s death, and in the midst of the hunt for the assassin. You will be able to traverse and stand in the same spots the assassin did exactly 161 years before. You can’t get much closer to history than that.

Thank you all, again, for your amazing support. I know Lincoln Conspirators has been a little slow of late as I focus on getting Lincoln Assassination Tours off the ground, and I greatly appreciate your patience and understanding.

Click the image above to register for our John Wilkes Booth escape route bus tour on Saturday, April 18, 2026.

Click the image above to register for our John Wilkes Booth escape route bus tour on Sunday, April 19, 2026.

Categories: Lincoln Assassination Tours | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment

The Other Reward Offers for John Wilkes Booth’s Capture By Steven G. Miller

 “It is hard to get them all in court”

The Other Reward Offers for John Wilkes Booth’s Capture

By Steven G. Miller

One of the most famous broadsides in American History was the one issued by the War Department on April 20, 1865, announcing a $100,000 reward for the capture of John Wilkes Booth, David Herold, and John H. Surratt. This poster is one of the best-known features of the assassination of President Lincoln, and is easily identifiable by people who know little of the details of Booth’s deed and its aftermath.

One of the least-known aspects of the Lincoln Assassination is the existence, specifics, and disposition of other monetary offers for Booth’s capture. I’ve discovered that there were at least nine of them, and they were made by cities and states from “coast to coast.” All of these offers were repudiated, ignored, or combined with other schemes. The only one that was settled was the one made by the Secretary of War.

  • The first reward offer was made on the 15th of April by General Christopher Columbus Augur, the commander of the Twenty-Second Army Corps, the man in charge of the Defenses of Washington. He proclaimed that $10,000 would be given to the person or persons who aided in the arrest of the assassins.

Courtesy The Historical Society of Washington, D.C.

  • Two days later, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Washington passed “Chapter 274 of the Special Laws of the Council of the City of Washington.” This Act stated: “Be it enacted by the Board of Aldermen and Board of Common Council of the City of Washington, that the Mayor be, and he is hereby authorized and requested to offer a reward of twenty thousand dollars for the arrest and conviction of the person or persons who were concerned in the assassination of President Lincoln, and attempted murder of Secretary Seward and family on the evening of the 14th inst. Provided that if more than one should be arrested and convicted, then said amount shall be apportioned accordingly. Approved April 17, 1865.”
  • Later that day, Colonel L.C. Baker, the infamous War Department detective-chief, published a handbill proclaiming a $30,000 Reward. It described John Wilkes Booth and offered a description of the “Person Who Attempted to Assassinate Hon. W.H. Seward, Secretary of State.” As a matter of explanation, Baker stated, “The Common Council of Washington, D.C. have offered a reward of $20,000 for the arrest and conviction of these Assassins, in addition to which I will pay $10,000.”

  • On some date unknown—possibly April 17—a $10,000 reward was supposedly offered by the Common Council of Philadelphia.
  • The City Council of Baltimore also offered $10,000 for the arrest of the assassin, a former hometown boy. An untitled squib, in the Davenport (IA) Daily Gazette, April 19, 1865, commented on the offer saying, “The feeling here (Baltimore) against Booth is greatly intensified by the fact that he is a Baltimorean, and it is desired by the people that one who has so dishonored the family should meet with speedy justice.”
  • On April 20th, Governor A.G. Curtin of Pennsylvania announced $10,000 for the capture of the assassin. However, this offer had a catch: the assassin had to be arrested on Pennsylvania soil.

  • On April 20, Edwin Stanton published his famous $100,000 reward, offering sums of $50,000 for Booth and $25,000 each for David Herold and John Surratt. A version of Stanton’s reward poster even had photos of the three major conspirators attached. Since this was in the days before the technique of printing halftone photos was developed, photographic prints of the three suspects were actually glued onto the printed piece. This is reportedly the first time actual photographs were added to a wanted poster. Copies of this broadside were distributed throughout Maryland and carried by search parties. The poster was also “re-composed” (re-typeset, in other words) and reprinted in New York City.

  • On some unspecified date, the State of California offered $100,000 in gold to the captors. The claim agents for Private Emory Parady, one of the captors of Booth and Herold, contacted the California officials, but nothing came of it, and nothing specific is known about this offer.
  • New York State supposedly offered a reward, too. Details are sketchy, but John Millington, another of the Garrett’s Farm patrol members, mentioned this in a 1913 letter to the National Tribune.

Most of these proposals died a quiet death and were forgotten in the aftermath of the arrest, trial, and execution of the conspirators. But attorneys pursued the offers made by the City of Baltimore, and the Washington City.

The Baltimore effort ended quickly. An article headlined “Capt. Doherty’s Story” in the August 22, 1879, New York Times explained what happened: “In the case of the claim against the City of Baltimore, which offered $30,000 {sic, should be $10,000} for the arrest of the assassin, Capt. Doherty did not sue to recover, the Mayor and Aldermen telling him point blank that they would not pay it, as the reward was offered under a previous administration. The claim has now lapsed by limitation.”

On November 24, 1865, the War Department issued “General Order No. 64”, which announced that a special commission would be set up to determine the validity of claims for the Reward and that all applications for a share had to be submitted by the end of the year.

It also announced that any other offered rewards were withdrawn. This applied to the $25,000 reward offered for John H. Surratt, who was still a fugitive, and to other amounts posted for members of the so-called Confederate “Canadian Cabinet.” When the final report of the commission was issued, the offers by General Augur and Colonel Baker had been incorporated into the Stanton offer of April 20th.

There was a great deal of wrangling involved in the settlement of the War Department $100,000 offer (as detailed in my article “Were The War Department Rewards Ever Paid?” February 1994, Surratt Courier), but that was minor as compared to the struggle over the reward offered by the officials of the City of Washington. A lawsuit was filed by the three National Detective Police officers in an effort to get the city fathers to live up to their promise. This fight involved a huge cast of characters and dragged on for over a dozen years. It took so long, in fact, that by the time it started moving through the courts, one of the major players was dead.

Here’s the story of that case:

On October 10, 1866, an equity case was filed in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia in General Term by the three detectives and their attorneys. It was designated case “No. 790” and was known as “L.C. Baker, E.J. Conger and L.B. Baker v. The City of Washington, et al.” There were forty-six individuals involved in the suit, all of whom had gotten shares of the War Department reward for the capture of Booth, Herold, Atzerodt, and Payne. The stated purpose of the case was: “For Distribution of the Reward offered by the City of Washington for Assassins of Abraham Lincoln, President of the U.S.”

As I pointed out in my earlier article, the troopers of the Garrett’s Farm patrol monitored the progress of the suit. One of the men who captured Booth, former private Emory Parady, received periodic progress reports from his agents, attorneys Owen & Wilson of Washington. On December 26, 1866, for instance, they wrote: “The suit on the city is progressing — there are so many parties it is hard to get them all in court so we can try. Capt. Dougherty is in North Carolina & we have not got service upon him and there are several others of the same character. When they are all properly before the Court we shall call it up & have it tried.”

The filing of motions, gathering and introduction of affidavits took the rest of 1866, 1867, and all of 1868. During this process, one of the prime movers, Col. Lafayette C. Baker, died in Philadelphia on July 3, 1868. Finally, all of the papers were submitted, and the Court took the matter under consideration. On April 20, 1869, the D.C. Supreme Court announced their verdict. They dismissed the case against the City, ordering that the plaintiffs pay the court costs.

The decision was appealed. On April 25, 1870, a re-argument of the case was granted by a Special Term of the D.C. Supreme Court. On September 29, 1870, the court received an “Amended Answer of the Mayor & Board of Aldermen & Common Council – motion for leave to file made in the Court sitting in General Term.”

The New York Herald summed up the case in an article on September 30th. There were several plaintiffs, the Herald said; the three detectives, Capt. Doherty, attorneys representing the 26 soldiers of the Garrett’s Farm patrol, and three civilians involved in the planning or capture of Mrs. Surratt and Louis Powell. The Herald laid out the positions of the various parties pretty clearly: The attorney for the Corporation of Washington opined that the City had had no authority to offer the reward, and that “the parties claiming this reward did nothing more than, as good citizens, they should have done.” He also stated that they were merely following the orders of their officers.

The counsel for Prentiss M. Clark, one of the civilians involved in the Mary Surratt arrest, stated that police, detectives, and soldiers had no claim since they were only doing their normal duties. By this argument, then, only civilians who gave evidence would be entitled to a chunk of the reward. (Clark was a mere civilian at the time of the arrest, naturally.)

The attorney for the troopers responded that it was not part of their duty as soldiers to assist in the capture of offenders against the law, and, besides, they were not subject to any orders from the officials of Washington City.

In the official documents of the case, counsel for the defendants stated that “the Mayor, Board of alderman and Board of Common Council of the City of Washington did not and do not possess any legal authority to offer or to pay out of the monies of the tax payers of said city any sum whatsoever for the purposes mentioned in the (1865) ordinance.”

Edward Doherty responded with evidence that the mayor had issued a Message on June 30, 1868, indicating that he would seek permission from Congress (which then, as now, governed the District and Washington City) to raise $550,000 in bonds. These were to pay city debts. One of the debts specifically mentioned in the message by the mayor was the $20,000 reward, Doherty noted.

On October 15, 1870, the Special term of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia dismissed the appeal. They found in favor of the City of Washington, et al, and against Stedpole (the executor of the estate of L.C. Baker, deceased), et al.

A long period of silence ensued, but on October 12, 1875, an appeal was filed with the United States Supreme Court. The two individuals who put up the $550 bond for the filing were Prentiss Clark and George F. Robinson, the attendant who helped save Secretary William Seward’s life in 1865.

The appeal was labeled Case No. 691. Which was soon changed to case number 441, and then to 200. It was placed on the docket for October Term 1877, but not called. It carried over to October Term 1878.

The High Court finally dealt with it, but not in a way that the plaintiffs hoped: on November 15, 1878, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the appeal “dismissed with costs” and ordered that the defendants get their costs from the complainants.

In the end, only the War Department paid any reward for the capture of the assassins of President Lincoln. In 1898, former Pvt. John W. Millington summed up the situation to a reporter in Sioux City, Iowa. The journalist stated: “Other rewards had been offered by different states, but Mr. Millington never saw any part of them and long ago came to the conclusion that most of them were in the nature of ‘grand stand plays’.”

Sources:
Boston Corbett-George A. Huron Papers, Kansas State Historical Society, Topeka, Kansas
“Lafayette C. Baker, Everton J. Conger and Luther B. Baker, v. City of Washington, et al,” Equity docket, Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, Equity Case 790, National Archives, Washington.
Miller, Steven G., “Were The War Department Rewards Ever Paid?” February 1994, Surratt Courier.
The Millington-Parady Papers, Steven G. Miller Collection.
“One of Booth’s Captors,” National Tribune (Washington, DC), June 26, 1913. (John Millington “wants to know why” the rewards offered by the governors of New York and Pennsylvania were never paid.)
“The Reward for the Discovery of the Lincoln Assassins,” New York Herald, September 30, 1870.
“Thirty-Three Years Ago. Anniversary of the Assassination of Lincoln by John Wilkes Booth. A Resident of Sioux City Who Assisted in the Capture of the Murderer. Story of the Pursuit and the Final Scene When He Refused to Be Taken Alive and Was Shot,” The Sioux City (IA) Times, April 14, 1898.


I’m grateful to my friend Steve Miller for allowing me to republish this very interesting article he wrote about the rewards offered for the capture of John Wilkes Booth. This article was originally published in the September 2006 edition of the Surratt Courier.

Categories: History, Steven G. Miller | Tags: , , , , , , | 7 Comments

The Kaw and the Last Lincoln Conspirator

November is Native American Heritage Month. Years ago, I shared a paper I wrote about Holata Micco, a Seminole chief in Florida who was known as Billy Bowlegs to non-Native speakers. As a child, John Wilkes Booth sometimes went by the nickname of Billy Bowlegs among his friends due to his bowleggedness. As a teen, he even ended a letter with this moniker.

I wanted to mark Native American Heritage Month on the social media pages for Lincoln Assassination Tours. I considered rehashing my work on Holata Micco, but the connection between the noted Seminole chief and the future assassin of Lincoln is pretty contrived. I considered discussing the Piscataway tribes as it was through their ancestral lands that the assassin made his escape. In fact, one of the figures in the escape, Oswell Swann (who innocently escorted the fugitives to Rich Hill), is said to have been part Piscataway Indian.

In the end, however, I decided to take my motivation from a historic image. The March 9, 1867, issue of Harper’s Weekly contains a full-page drawing of the return of John Surratt to the United States after a year and ten months on the run.

The scene at the Washington Navy Yard was captured by Andrew McCallum, the same artist who, in 1865, had sketched the nearby home of David Herold.

A notable detail in the drawing showing John Surratt’s return is the presence of three Native Americans wearing headdresses.

The inclusion of Native Americans in this scene was not artistic license. The corresponding article in Harper’s contains the line, “There were not many persons besides the officials and guards present, only a few reporters and our artist, and a number of Indians of the Sioux delegation now at Washington, having been permitted to witness the scene.” Harper’s was partially right. A large delegation of Native Americans was present in Washington in February of 1867, but only some were from the Sioux tribe. While I initially held little hope of being able to identify the specific Native Americans who observed John Surratt’s arrival, I was fortunate that the Washington Chronicle newspaper had already done so.

I was even more fortunate to discover that the Kaw delegation was photographed during their time in Washington, providing me with a photo of the two chiefs who witnessed the disembarking. After doing more research on the Kaw people and their history, I was excited to write something about them.

In the end, I decided to create a video about the Kaw men who were present when John Surratt returned to face trial. I put the video on the Lincoln Assassination ToursFacebook, Instagram, Bluesky, and YouTube pages. I hope you’ll consider following those platforms for more historical tidbits.

So, without further ado, here’s the video, The Kaw and the Last Lincoln Conspirator. I hope you enjoy it.

Categories: History, Lincoln Assassination Tours | Tags: , , | 5 Comments

Lincoln Assassination Tours Trailer

Thank you all for your lovely outpouring of support for Lincoln Assassination Tours. Since launching over a week ago, we’ve sold several tickets for each of our first three Spring 2026 tours. At this moment, our discounted debut tour in March is already 24% full! I’m very grateful to all of you who have purchased tickets or have joined our mailing list to stay up to date about future tours.

I hope you might also consider following the Lincoln Assassination Tours social media accounts on your favorite platforms. As a niche tour company, it can be hard to find an audience. By following, interacting with, and sharing our content on social media, you can help spread the news about what we have to offer. You can find Lincoln Assassination Tours on Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky, and YouTube.

To help advertise the tours, I put together a trailer and just published it across our platforms. I hope you’ll give it a watch and consider sharing it with any friends or family you think would enjoy the tour.

Categories: Lincoln Assassination Tours | Tags: , , , , , | 2 Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.