When Junius Took the Stage – Part 2

I’m in the midst of reading the book, Junius Brutus Booth: Theatrical Prometheus by Stephen M. Archer. Though I’m only about 40 pages into it, I already have the book brimming with Post-It notes marking items of interest requiring further investigation. The most fascinating things I’ve come across thus far, is the drama that occurred when Junius Brutus Booth made his star debut in the theaters of London.  In preparation for a post about the matter, I found myself with a wealth of material on the early theatrical life of Junius Brutus Booth.  Instead of summarizing key points of Junius’ initial acting career, I decided to write a series of posts examining the humble acting beginnings of the man who would later father a theatrical dynasty, including the assassin of President Lincoln. What follows is the first part of a series of posts entitled, “When Junius Took the Stage”.  Click here for Part 1 of the series.

Part 2 – When Junius Took to the Sea

When we left Junius Brutus Booth, it was March of 1814 and he was back at home with his father, Richard.  Malnutrition and illness had befallen Junius while he was engaged in his introductory acting tour as a glorified supernumerary.  His pay was so low he could not afford adequate subsistence and was forced back home.  Richard, relieved at the return of his son, hoped that this foolishness with acting was at an end.  This was not to be, however.  The allure of the stage proved too strong for Junius, and just days after this 18th birthday, he left his father’s house to rejoin his acting troupe of Jonas-Penley.  For this leg of the tour however, the company would not be traveling to the fishing villages and dock towns of England’s coast.  Rather, they had a more adventurous destination awaiting for them, and it is likely that Junius, having been thwarted at his attempt to escape seaward at a younger age, was up for the journey.  The Jonas-Penley Company set sail for continental Europe.

The journey was the first of its kind for Junius, who proceeded to keep a diary of his trek.  Using the details Junius provided and a map, we can follow his route almost exactly.

Junius and the other members of the Jonas-Penley troupe, began their journey on Friday May 6th ultimately bound for Amsterdam, Holland.

England & Netherlands

Forgiving my now unalterable errors in writing, what follows is an animated map showing the path Junius’ ship took in departing England:

Junius-to-Europe-1814-Part-

When passing by the Nore, a sandbank in the Thames estuary, Junius wrote the following:

“We dropped down and reached the Nore, where the fleet were at anchor. About eight o’clock I observed, for the first time, the setting sun, which went down in all its splendor, leaving the world to the influence of Luna till the morn. At the same time the admiral’s ship fired the evening-gun, on which all the rest followed the example, and the music on board played ‘God save the king!’
After contemplating the beauties of the evening and reflecting on my situation till dark, we betook ourselves to the hold, which was our bedchamber (the cabin being for the accommodation of the ladies), and slept upon a box all night.”

When the ship finally left the English shores near Orfordness and went out to sea, Junius went on to write:

“Saw several porpoises; wind against us, but very fine weather. In the afternoon I, among the rest, was taken sick, went into the hold and lay till next morning. We were now almost out of sight of land, which, as we gradually lost, I felt a kind of regret within me at leaving my native shore.”

At first, Junius attempted to make the most out of their journey, as one of Booths fellow actors later recounted:

“On going down to the hold, our ears were saluted with the exclamation, ‘By Holy Paul, I will not dine before his head be brought to me,’ – from Jane Shore; wondering whence the voice proceeded, we presently saw a figure seated astride a barrel, having the fragments of a meat pie before him, and surrounded by such towering heaps of boxes as almost buried him from observation; but on nearer approach, his look betrayed no ordinary degree of intelligence, and there was something altogether as interesting as grotesque in the scene—his plate was raised by the box which contained his whole wardrobe, and which was about the size of a lady’s dressing case—but not of such bright materials. The impending packages enveloped all the treasure of the histrionic adventurers; and wretched as his situation might appear to the uninitiated, he had it in its power to make a pillow of the cestus of Venus, and a footstool of the thunderbolts of Jove!”

Photo Jun 06, 9 27 47 PM

However, as the journey went on the sea started to take its toll on the 18 year-old land lubber. His accommodations were not in the least bit comfortable:

“We came in sight of land on Monday evening, but soon lost it. The night was very cold, and three of us, Platt, Jones, and myself, slept on a tub, covered by a coat which we borrowed from a sailor, near a poor, sick Prussian, who infested the ship with garlic. We slept, for the first time since our departure, for about two hours, but were soon awakened by the roaring of the sea and the jargon of the Prussian and a sailor quarrelling about the bed.”

Over the north sea

As shown on the map above, the ship was bound for Amsterdam, but long before they reached this destination the cast members already had enough of the North Sea:

“The wind was right in our teeth. They made several tacks, but lost upon all. We were apprehensive of danger. At night we were in sight of land, and many of us insisted upon going ashore in the morning; then betook ourselves to our miserable beds on the casks and boxes. As soon as morning broke, we insisted on the men making signals for a boat to come to our assistance; and, about seven o’clock, some fishermen put off through the raging surf. We entreated the captain to put into Rotterdam; but he refused to do so, being bound for Amsterdam.
At length the boat came alongside. When we saw the rude, savage appearance of the men, cased as they were in leather and wearing large hairy caps and wooden shoes, we made some scruple of trusting ourselves with them; but we had resolved not to remain in the vessel, which had become hateful to us. We asked what money they wanted; and these fellows, true Dutchmen, demanded ten guineas to take us on shore, — a distance of about three miles. This did not tally with our pockets; so, after much grumbling, they agreed to take two guineas.”

Departing from their ship and into the fishermen’s vessel, Junius and the rest of the company were making a desperate dash for land. The turmoil and poor conditions on the ship were too much for this group of actors. Not to give up so easily, old Neptune even challenged their arrival to shore:

“A crowd of women and children had collected on the shore to see us land. The surf beat violently and prevented us landing, on which these fellows jumped into the sea; and, taking a sort of grappling-iron with them, stuck it in among the stones. They then returned; and each taking one of us astride his back, brought us to the shore. This was at Petten, near Camperdown, on Wednesday, 11th of May.”

While finally out of the sea, the troupe was still a distance away from their goal of Amsterdam.

In holland

His trials still not over, Junius recounts his difficulty in traveling by land in Holland:

“After satisfying our ravenous appetites we set out. I had not walked far when my feet grew so sore, that I could not put them to the ground. I was obliged to loiter on the way, and with the assistance of Mr. John Penley, I limped along, but was forced to take off my shoes, and hopped over the roads, on banks of canals, composed of shells. I was left behind at a considerable distance without a stiver in my pocket, in a foreign Country, and with symptoms of illness. I could not help cursing my folly at leaving England. About six, I reached Alkemar, where I found my companions smoking their pipes and drinking wine in the Crown Hotel.”

Clearly Junius was no leading star yet, being left behind by his group actors due to his inability to keep up.  Those last two sentences seem to shout contempt at his fellow actors.

“The next morning, hurried to the boat which was to convey us to Amsterdam. I was astonished at the vast number of mills I saw on every side, which verifies the remark that Cervantes should not have written ‘ Don Quixote ’ till he had seen Holland. We proceeded to Saardam, a delightful place, and reached the great city of Amsterdam, May 12, 1814.”

Though the trip from London to Amsterdam took only six days, it clearly appears to have been the longest six days of this young man’s life.

While working on this post, I came across an interesting discrepancy between Dr. Archer’s biography on Junius Brutus Booth and Asia Booth Clarke’s book about her father. In recounting the name of the ship that Junius and the rest of the troupe took from London and Amsterdam, Dr. Archer gives the name as the Three Brothers. In Asia’s book, she gives the ship’s name as the Two Brothers. Interestingly the Two Brothers is the name of the ship that would later bring Junius Brutus Booth and Mary Ann Holmes to America. So, while I trust Dr. Archer’s work and assume Asia made a mistake with the ship’s name, I can’t help but wonder “what if Dr. Archer is wrong?”. This could mean that Junius subjected himself to the same ship and conditions more than once and, the latter time, forced his mistress to join him. Perhaps, when looking for a way to abscond to America, Junius stuck with “the devil he knew” and booked passage aboard the same ship that first took him from England. More research is needed.

In the next installment in this series, we will look at Junius’ time in continental Europe during which he meets an individual who will alter his life forever.

References:
Junius Brutus Booth: Theatrical Prometheus by Stephen Archer
Booth Memorials: Passages and Incidents and Anecdotes in the Life of Junius Brutus Booth by Asia Booth Clark
Memoirs of Junius Brutus Booth from his Birth to the Present Time

Categories: Uncategorized | 4 Comments

The Rathbones – Lost and Found

One of the most tragic stories connected to the assassination of Abraham Lincoln is that of the Rathbones.  As guests of the Lincoln’s that fateful night, Major Henry Rathbone and his fiancée, Clara Harris, had front row seats to the crime of the century.  The aftermath of that encounter shaped the pair and ultimately culminated in Henry Rathbone’s mental break and subsequent murder of Clara while living abroad  in Germany.

Major Henry Rathbone and Clara Harris (composite by the author)

Major Henry Rathbone and Clara Harris (composite by the author)

After Clara was buried, Henry lived out the rest of his days in a German insane asylum before he, too, joined her in the ground.  The story held that, after a lack of attention and payment to the cemetery for upkeep, the graves of Henry and Clara Rathbone were dug up and the bodies were disposed of to free the plot up for new burials.  However, recent work by researcher Eva Elisabeth Lennartz of Germany has found some exciting new information about the fate of the Rathbones’ remains.

The information was first shared on Roger Norton’s impeccable Lincoln Discussion Symposium.  Please visit both of the following links below to learn more about the Rathbones in Germany:

Major Rathbone’s accommodation in Hannover – Lincoln Discussion Symposium

Rathbone Uncovered – Lincoln Discussion Symposium

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: | 7 Comments

The King’Pin’ and his Gang

eBay, that wonderful online auction house for the everyman, is full of unique objects up for sale. When not searching for a new, “Inflatable Unicorn Horn” for my cat, I tend to do searches for Lincoln assassination related things. Most of the time it’s the same old books and prints. Yawn… Last week, however, I found myself bidding on, and winning, some truly one-of-a-kind Lincoln assassination tchotchkes: conspirator pins!

20130603-193432.jpg

Though little description came with the pins, it appears as though some history minded Lions Club members decided to make pins for themselves based on the different conspirators. Each pin contains an image and name of a conspirator, a description of their involvement in a couple words, and, on the side, their ultimate fate. The pins also contain the name of the Lions Club person for whom the pin was presumedly made for.

20130603-192103.jpg

20130603-192115.jpg

20130603-192126.jpg

20130603-192142.jpg

20130603-192155.jpg

20130603-192208.jpg

20130603-192219.jpg

20130603-192252.jpg

20130603-192324.jpg

20130603-192348.jpg

You’ll notice they made the understandable error of confusing Hartman Richter’s mug shot for Dr. Mudd. It also appears that Michael O’Laughlen and Edman Spangler got a bit more facial hair. I’ll also leave it up to you to decide how accurate their descriptions of each conspirator is.

There were impulse buys, but not ones that I regret…yet. It just goes to show you that, no matter what you’re looking for, eBay can surprise you sometimes. Now I’m going back to searching for more practical things like the most affordable can of unicorn meat.

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: | 11 Comments

The Second Death of Abraham Lincoln

Thank you to Richard Sloan for sending this unique, albeit strange, comic book from his collection. You can see excerpts of other Lincoln assassination comic books here.

Second Death of Lincoln 1 Second Death of Lincoln 2 Second Death of Lincoln 3 Second Death of Lincoln 4 Second Death of Lincoln 5 Second Death of Lincoln 6 Second Death of Lincoln 7

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , | 3 Comments

When Junius Took the Stage – Part 1

I’m in the midst of reading the book, Junius Brutus Booth: Theatrical Prometheus by Stephen M. Archer. Though I’m only about 40 pages into it, I already have the book brimming with Post-It notes marking items of interest requiring further investigation. The most fascinating things I’ve come across thus far, is the drama that occurred when Junius Brutus Booth made his star debut in the theaters of London.  In preparation for a post about the matter, I found myself with a wealth of material on the early theatrical life of Junius Brutus Booth.  Instead of summarizing key points of Junius’ initial acting career, I decided to write a series of posts examining the humble acting beginnings of the man who would later father a theatrical dynasty, including the assassin of President Lincoln. What follows is the first part of a series of posts entitled, “When Junius Took the Stage”
Young Drawing of Junius Brutus Booth

Undated drawing of a young Junius Brutus Booth.

The year is 1813 and Junius Brutus Booth is 17 years old.  He is an energetic and passionate young man, rebelling at the desires of his widowed father, Richard Booth, at every turn.  Junius loathed the printing apprenticeship Richard had secured for him.  He worked under the apprenticeship of a printer by the name of George Piggot at 60 Old Street, London.  According to Junius he aided in the printing of items like “ballads, tales of wonder, and stories of fairies and goblins.”  In addition, Piggott printed the “dying speeches” of soon to be executed criminals.  These were single sided broadsides, sold in the streets of an execution to the gathered masses.  They usually contained a description of the condemned man’s last hours and a confession, often in the style of a cautionary poem:

One of George Piggot’s “dying speeches” broadsides.  Junius would have assisted in the printing of these.  Source: Harvard Law School Library

One of George Piggot’s “dying speeches” broadsides. Junius would have assisted in the printing of these. Source: Harvard Law School Library

Junius, in a move that eerily duplicated the actions of his father at his age, sought to sail away from his apprenticeship and life in England.  Had the winds been more favorable to his quest, Junius would have sailed away as a cabin boy bound for Rio de Janeiro before his father ever knew he was gone, however, Richard did find out about his plan and retrieved the boy before his ship set sail.  This was not the first time Richard had to save this misguided youth.  Not once, but twice, Richard, the lawyer, had to defend his son against paternity tests.  Though official court records of these suits against Junius have not been found, early Booth biographers state that Richard lost both suits and was forced to pay for his son’s carnal transgressions.

So what was this rebellious young man to do with his life?  Printing and the law had no appeal to him.  Then, on either October 7th or 13th, 1813, Junius Brutus Booth went to see Othello at London’s Covent Garden Theatre.  That experience would set the path that Junius would follow for the rest of his life.  Invigorated with the allure of the stage and the possibility of fame and fortune, Junius sought to make himself an actor.  It is likely that the opposition to the venture brought forth by his father only further fueled Junius’ desire to attempt the stage.

He started, as practically all aspiring actors did, in a nursery theater.  Akin to modern community theaters, these playhouses were little more than barns or lofts, where milkmen and laborers who dreamed of stardom performed for the local crowd.  From this, Junius was able to secure himself his first professional engagement when he signed on as a member of an acting troupe and toured around the dock towns and river villages of England.  This afforded him the minuscule salary of one pound sterling a week.  As a paid actor in this troupe he made his theatrical career debut on December 13th, 1813 in the comedy, The Honeymoon by John Tobin.  From my quick scanning of some of the text, I can ascertain that the main character, a Duke, has married a very beautiful, yet proud and feisty woman.  In order to “train” her to be gentler, the Duke decides, as a honey moon, to take his wife to a peasant’s hut and make to act that he is actually a commoner who has been impersonating a duke.  When his new wife goes to the duke’s castle to inform against him and request a divorce, the duke has one of his servants, Jaques, play the part of himself, hilarity ensues.  Again, this was just a cursory glance of the text and may be inaccurate.  Nevertheless, Junius Brutus Booth played the part of Campino in this professional stage debut.  Campino is an extraordinarily minor role, with only a handful of speaking lines.  Essentially, Campino is just a named servant who gets to read the words of the Duke ordering the servants to treat the simpleton, Jaques, as if he was the true Duke.  He is present when Jaques enters for the first time in royal clothing to the laughter of all the other servants, as depicted in this engraving:

Honeymoon engraving

When asked by another servant how Jaques was fairing with his newly bestowed nobility, Junius, as Campillo replied, “Like most men in whom sudden fortune combats against long-established habit.”

Junius would continue traveling with this troupe through the various dock villages, making a pittance.  His meager salary forced him to rely on only one meal a day and, by March of 1814, illness and poverty forced him back home to his father.  For a while, it appeared as if Junius’ acting days were done.

Stay tuned for future posts in this series regarding Junius Brutus Booth’s early life on the stage.

References:
Junius Brutus Booth: Theatrical Prometheus by Stephen M. Archer
The Honeymoon by John Tobin

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: | 5 Comments

The Booth Log Cabin

As I noted in one of my previous posts, Tudor Hall was not the original Booth family home in Bel Air, Maryland.  At first, Junius Brutus Booth, Mary Ann Holmes and little Junius Brutus Booth, Jr. lived in a rented log cabin belonging to a Bel Air family by the name of Rodgers.  As Ella Mahoney, the owner of Tudor Hall from when the Booth’s gave it up in 1878 to her death in 1948, wrote:

“The little house in which they were living had been occupied by the Rogers’, who some years before, having rented the farm and gone to live in town, becoming discontented and the lease not having expired, built this for a temporary home until they could regain possession of their house.”

When Junius Brutus Booth leased the 150 acres he and his family would live on in May of 1822 (he could not buy it outright because he was not a citizen of the United States), he purchased the cabin from the Rodgers and had it moved away from their house:

“The house was strongly built, and Mr. Booth bought and moved it. It caused quite an excitement in the neighborhood, people coming to witness the novel sight of a house being rolled across the fields, and many lent a helping hand.

Mr. Booth chose a location for his home near a fine spring. In front of the house stood a large cherry tree, and at the back a sycamore, which has grown to immense size, being now eighteen feet in circumference. In that house they lived until later they built this substantial brick house [Tudor Hall]…”

With the exception of the oldest and youngest children,  Junius Jr. and Joseph Adrian Booth, all of the Booths were born in this log cabin by the spring.

Ella Mahoney goes on to describe this log cabin home even further:

“The old house still stood on the front lawn when I first knew the place. I remember it well. The main part of the house — the part that was moved — had had added at the east end a kitchen built of logs, a big stone chimney on the outside, and a wide fireplace within. At the west end also a log addition, which had never been finished, no floors laid above or below. As a child I used to play in that old house, and walk on some boards laid on the sleepers of the upper story.

The main part of the house consisted of one large room, with hall running through at one end. A door opened out at either end, and at one side a well preserved stairway and railing; a landing well up; a large closet under the stairway, and also a closet in the big room above, in which room as well as in the room below, was a fireplace, with shelves in the wall on either side. I remember these closets so well, on account of having seen a cross goose sitting in the room below, and another walk deliberately past us when we were playing in the room above, and go to her nest in the closet there.

The old house was so unattractive, standing as it did in front of this house, and in such a state of decay, that my husband had it removed when he began improvements about the place, as I suppose the Booths had intended doing. There were the remains of another building near the back of the house, a room perhaps for the servants. There was a log springhouse near the spring, through which the overflow from the spring ran; also the remains of an old cider press.”

The Booth log cabin was still in existence when Ella Mahoney’s husband bought the place from Mary Ann Booth in 1878.  As stated above he, “had it removed”.  But removed to where?

Reader Steve Lohrmann, who visited Tudor Hall when it was the private home of Dorothy and Howard Fox, recalls this story:

“I’ve been to Tudor Hall twice when it was a private residence, and met the owner of that time, Mr. Fox. He was very nice and showed me around the place. The little tour he gave me was very interesting, but there is one thing Mr. Fox told me that I forgot until I read about the cabin. He told me Tudor Hall’s kitchen is built around the old cabin. Is that true?”

After doing some research, I don’t believe this to be the case.  If the log cabin was transformed into the kitchen when Tudor Hall was built in 1851/52, then Ella Mahoney would had never even seen the log cabin since she wasn’t born until 1858.  In addition, in the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties report about Tudor Hall, no special mention is given to the kitchen in regards to it being the original cabin but, instead, implies the kitchen on Tudor Hall was created at about the same time as Tudor Hall and then later connected to the house:

“The separate kitchen house is a very late example of an earlier custom.  Although it does not appear in the published plan, it is suggested in the published lithograph perspective…

Changes: In the late 19th century, the kitchen house was joined to the main house by infilling construction.  The space thus enclosed was incorporated into the dining room.  The kitchen chimney was reduced to a single stove flue and the kitchen stair was removed…”

So the Tudor Hall kitchen is not the original cabin.  However, this Historic Property report for Tudor Hall does provide some valuable information on what did happen to the Booth log cabin.

Before getting to that though, I have to thank another reader of the blog, Elsie Picyk.  Elsie is a resident of Port Tobacco, MD and volunteered during the archaeology project that occurred there.  Back in October, she sent me the Fall 2012 edition of the Maryland State and Highway Administration’s Cultural Resources Bulletin.  On page 8 of that bulletin appeared an article about the Booth Log Cabin:

Booth Log House article

Before reading this, I never even thought that the original home of the Booths near Bel Air could have survived into the present day.  After reading it, I made sure this was a house I visited when I went to Tudor Hall.  This article linked to the Historic Properties report for the “Booth Log House” and, despite a couple errors with dates, it explains how the house came to stand today.

As stated by Ella Mahoney in her book, her first husband Samuel Kyle, had the Booth log cabin moved away from Tudor Hall sometime after he bought the property in 1878.  It was moved to its current location, at the intersection of Churchville Road and Prospect Mill Road in Harford County:

Tudor Hall - Cabin map

At that time, that land was still part of the Tudor Hall property.  Over the years, the “Booth Log House” has been extensively changed.  As described in the Cultural Resources Bulletin:

“As currently configured, the dwelling is an irregular amalgamation built in four different sections: the original side-gable log house is sandwiched between a circa 1900 single story hipped-roof kitchen addition and circa 1950 two-story shed-roof addition to the north and the circa 1925, two-story, gable-front Classical Revival addition to the south.   The original log section is hard to discern from the other sections, only notable by its steep, gable ends incorporated into the east and west elevations shown by the arrow on the above picture.”

Though added to and changed over the years the middle portion of this house, noted by the gables on the ends, is the Booth family’s log cabin.  This is the dwelling that Rosalie, Henry Byron, Mary Ann, Frederick, Elizabeth, Edwin, Asia, and John Wilkes Booth were all born into.

Booth Cabin Aerial

Here are some pictures I took of the house during our visit:

Booth cabin 1
Booth cabin 2
Booth cabin 3
Booth cabin 4

So, when you go and visit historic Tudor Hall, include a slight detour down the road to see what remains of the original Booth family log cabin – the birthplace of the Booths.

Update: As always, make sure to read the comments from others. It appears that there is some doubt as to the authenticity of this being the Booth’s log cabin.

References:
Sketches of Tudor Hall and the Booth family by Ella Mahoney
Maryland State and Highway Administration’s Cultural Resources Bulletin, Fall 2012
Maryland Historical Trust Inventory of Historic Properties Report for Tudor Hall
Maryland Historical Trust Inventory of Historic Properties Report for the Booth Log House

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: | 16 Comments

Kieran McAuliffe’s Booth Escape Route Map

Earlier this week, I received a generous offer from Kieran McAuliffe. He has recently revised and reissued his John Wilkes Booth Escape Route map. Today I came home from our trip to D.C. to find a copy of his new map in my mailbox.

20130525-194621.jpg

Mr. McAuliffe has nicely improved on his original map, adding more images and fine tuning the specific routes taken by Booth and the soldiers tracking him down.

20130525-195222.jpg

20130525-195618.jpg

Excerpt from Kieran McAuliffe’s original John Wilkes Booth Escape Route map.

20130525-195700.jpg

Excerpt from the revised version of Mr. McAuliffe’s map. Notice the greater detail showing the routes taken.

His map is a must have for any one interested in the assassination. It provides a nice, concise account and beneficial visual of the escape route. You can purchase Mr. McAuliffe’s new map from the Surratt House Museum or from Amazon.

I’m looking forward to Mr. McAuliffe’s future maps.

20130525-200808.jpg

Read more about Kieran McAuliffe and his work here: http://historymapsetc.com/kierans-bio/

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: | 6 Comments

At the National Hotel

I am currently eating at Mary Surratt’s former H street boardinghouse, now Wok & Roll restaurant, in D.C.’s Chinatown. My reason for coming into the city today, was to visit the Newseum. I had previously visited the Newseum a few years ago when they had an exhibit going on about James Swanson’s book, Manhunt. Today, I came to view their current exhibit, JFK: Three Shots Were Fired, which contains artifacts relating to JFK’s assassination.

The Newseum is built on the former site of the Naional Hotel, Booth’s hotel of choice when in the city. After the assassination, detectives raided his room at the National and retrieved his trunk and papers left in his room. One of the papers found, signed Sam, would implicate Samuel Arnold in the conspiracy.

As with any museum I visit, here are a few pictures of Lincoln assassination related things found in the Newseum, oddly enough mainly just a couple newspapers:

20130525-150020.jpg

20130525-150537.jpg

20130525-150905.jpg

20130525-150936.jpg

20130525-150951.jpg

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: | 9 Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.