Posts Tagged With: John Wilkes Booth

Breakfast with Booth: Lucy Hale

In an earlier post, I introduced you to Carrie Bean, a young socialite from New York who journalist George Alfred Townsend claimed had breakfast with John Wilkes Booth on the morning of Lincoln’s murder. GATH is our only source for this event, but Miss Bean’s connection to the National Hotel and some of its residents makes it possible that this breakfast did occur. However, Carrie Bean is not the only one who has been linked to the assassin’s morning meal. There are sources that state that Booth spent his final breakfast before his infamous deed in the presence of his fiancée, Lucy Hale.

Lucy Hale likely needs no introduction to readers of this blog. In 1865, Lucy was the 24-year-old daughter of New Hampshire Senator John P. Hale and his wife, Lucy Lambert. The Hales often resided at the National Hotel when staying in Washington. At the time of the assassination, Senator Hale was in a sort of limbo. In June of 1864, the statesman had lost his bid for renomination by the New Hampshire Republican party and was replaced by Aaron Cragin. When Lincoln took office for his second term on March 4, 1865, Hale was officially out of a job. However, the staunch abolitionist lobbied for an ambassadorship position. On March 10, Hale was nominated to become the administration’s new minister to Spain. At the time of the assassination, the Hales were preparing for their new lives abroad.

At what point John Wilkes Booth and Lucy Hale met and subsequently became romantically involved is unknown. A commonly repeated yet erroneous story claims their romance began in 1862 when Booth sent Lucy a valentine signed “A Stranger.” This is too early of a period for the two to have become entwined. John Wilkes Booth didn’t even make his first appearance on the D.C. stage until 1863. The source of this erroneous story is a letter to a “Miss Hale” that was found in an antique store by Richmond “Boo” Morcom. In 1970, American Heritage published an article written by Morcom titled, They All Loved Lucy, in which he attributed the letter to Booth without evidence. After Morcom’s passing in 2012, his papers were donated to the New Hampshire Historical Society. A look at the original document shows that the letter is not in John Wilkes Booth’s handwriting. To demonstrate this, here is the end of the “Stranger” valentine found by Morcom with a sample of John Wilkes Booth’s writing underneath it. I’ve underlined some of the same words found in each letter for easy comparison.

The letter and word formations are just too different to have been written by John Wilkes Booth.

Part of the reason this incorrect story continues to live on is due to the fact that John Wilkes Booth is known to have composed a valentine for Lucy Hale. Junius Brutus Booth, Jr. wrote a letter to his sister Asia, updating her on family matters. John Wilkes was visiting Junius in New York at the time and June wrote to Asia that:

“John sat up all Mondays night to put Miss Hales valentine in the mail – and slept on the sofa – to be up early & kept me up last night until 3 1/2 AM – to wait while he wrote her a long letter & kept me awake by every now and then useing me as a dictionary…”

While John Wilkes is documented as having composed a valentine for Lucy Hale, this occurred in February of 1865, and we do not have any idea what his valentine said. It was likely destroyed, along with all other correspondences from Booth, by Lucy Hale or her family in the aftermath of Lincoln’s assassination.

While Lucy and Booth may have known of each other as early as 1863, when Booth made his Washington debut, it doesn’t seem like they had much in the way of a relationship until late 1864. During the summer and early fall months of 1864, John Wilkes Booth stayed with his family in New York and then traveled into the Pennsylvania oil region. He was actually infatuated with another woman at this time, 16-year-old Isabel Sumner, whom he had met during his Boston engagement in the spring. It wasn’t until November of 1864 that Booth’s residency at the National Hotel started as Washington became his base of operations in his conspiracy against Lincoln. Thus, his and Lucy’s romance was a relatively quick one.

A few years ago, I wrote about an envelope dated March 5, 1865, that contains poems by John Wilkes Booth and Lucy Hale. I explained that while some authors have used this envelope as evidence that the couple broke up on this date, I believe this conclusion to be incorrect. The two were planning a life together despite the difficulties involved with her father’s nomination to be the next minister to Spain. Lucy was expected to accompany her family to their new country. As a result, John P. Hale started having his family learn some of the Spanish language they would soon be immersed in. In mid to late March, Lucy Hale traveled to New York City and stayed with friends as she took some rudimentary Spanish lessons. On March 21, Booth traveled up to New York City ostensibly to be there for his brother Edwin’s 100th night of Hamlet the next day. However, according to Junius Brutus Booth, Jr.’s diary entry on March 22, “John came on to see Miss Hale.”

In the aftermath of John’s crime, Asia Booth wrote a letter to her friend Jean Anderson where she described the relationship between John and Lucy as the Booth family understood it:

“I told you, I believe, that Wilkes was engaged to Miss Hale. They were devoted lovers and she has written heart-broken letters to Edwin about it. Their marriage was to have been in a year, when she promised to return from Spain for him, either with her father or without him. That was the decision only a few days before this awful calamity. Some terrible oath hurried him to this wretched end. God help him.”

There is no evidence that Lucy Hale had any foreknowledge of what her secret fiance was planning.

Due to her being the daughter of a former Senator, Lucy Hale’s name was mainly kept out of the papers in the aftermath of Booth’s crime. There were a few references to Booth having been engaged to a New England Senator’s daughter, but propriety kept her actual name out of it. As years went by, however, more details came out about their relationship from some of Booth’s former friends and acquaintances.


In December of 1881, a journalist by the name of Col. Frank A. Burr wrote at length about John Wilkes Booth for the Philadelphia Sunday Press. Burr had done an immense amount of research into the life and death of John Wilkes Booth. He traveled down to the Garrett Farm and interviewed members of the Garrett family about Booth’s final days. He visited Green Mount Cemetery and described the Booth family plot. Burr also interviewed friends of Booth’s in order to flesh out his motivations. The result was one, or perhaps two, lengthy articles covering many aspects of Booth’s life, crime, and death. The reason I am uncertain about how many articles Burr’s work was split into is because, try as I might, I have been unable to track down the relevant Sunday issue(s) of the Philadelphia Press. These particular editions seem to be an endangered (or possibly extinct) species in archives and libraries today.

While Burr’s original piece has proven elusive, continued interest in Lincoln’s assassination meant that several newspapers reprinted parts of his work, often splitting it up into more manageable portions. The Evening Star out of Washington, D.C., appears to be one of the first to reprint part of Burr’s work. A lengthy article called “Booth’s Bullet” credited to the Philadelphia Press and “F.A.B.” was published in the Evening Star on December 7, 1881.

It appears that the Evening Star chose to cut out the whole section about Burr’s trip to the Garrett farm. Instead, the article was broken into three sections. The first section documented Burr’s visit to John Wilkes Booth’s grave in Green Mount Cemetery. The second was an interview Burr had with John T. Ford, and the third section was Burr’s interview with actor John Mathews. On the day of the assassination, Booth had given Mathews a sealed envelope, which he instructed Mathews to give to the newspapers the next day. The envelope contained Booth’s written explanation for why he assassinated Lincoln. Mathews was a member of the Ford’s Theatre cast and witnessed Lincoln’s assassination firsthand. Afterward, he returned to his boarding house, which happened to be the Petersen House, where Lincoln was taken. As the President lay dying in an adjacent bedroom, John Mathews opened the sealed envelope and read the assassin’s manifesto. After finishing it, Mathews made the decision to burn the letter, fearing it would implicate him in Booth’s great crime. The entirety of the “Booth’s Bullet” from the Evening Star can be read here.

Within this article, there are several references to Lucy Hale. John T. Ford stated to Burr that:

“Booth was a very gifted young man, and was a great favorite in society in Washington. He was engaged, it was said, to a young lady of high position and character. I understood that she wrote to Edwin Booth after the assassination telling him that she was his brother’s betrothed, and would marry him, even at the foot of the scaffold.”

John Mathews related a lengthy exchange he had with Booth regarding love and Lucy Hale:

“‘John, were you ever in love?’
‘No. I never could afford it.’ I replied.
‘I wish I could say as much. I am a captive. You cannot understand how I feel. What are those lines in Romeo and Juliet describing love? I have played them a hundred times but they have flown from me.’
‘Will you stand a bottle if I’ll give them to you?’ I asked.
‘I will – two of them,’ replied Booth.
‘Here are the lines,’ I answered:
O! anything, of nothing first create!
O! heavy lightness! Serious vanity!
Mis-shapen chaos of well-seeming forms!
‘That’s it,’ replied Booth. ‘If it were not for this girl I could feel easy. Think of it, John, that at my time of life – just starting, as it were – I should be in love!’

[Burr:] Did he mention the lady’s name?
[Mathews:] Oh, yes; but that shall be sacred with me. She is married now, and it would serve no good purpose either to his memory or to the truth of history to revive it. He loved her as few men love. He had a great mind and a generous heart, and both were centered upon this girl, whom he intended to make his wife. Her picture was taken from his person after he was killed.”

In addition to these mentions of Booth and Lucy’s romance, this article is the earliest source that places Lucy Hale with Booth at breakfast on the morning of his great crime. John T. Ford stated the following:

“The facts in the case are that he never knew the President was to attend the theater until nearly noon of that day. He was always a late riser. He came down to breakfast about ten o’clock on that morning, and his fiancee, who also boarded at the National Hotel with her parents, met him. They had a short conversation, and after breakfast he walked up to the Surratt mansion on H street, as is supposed from the direction in which he was first seen coming by the attaches of the theater that morning.”

To be fair, this description is a little vague as to whether Lucy Hale joined Booth for breakfast or merely had a conversation with him during his breakfast. Lucy’s inclusion is really a throwaway reference in a section about Booth’s movements. However, it still connects the two on the morning of the assassination.

Another paper that reprinted Frank A. Burr’s work was The Atlanta Constitution. They published the story of Burr’s visit to the Garrett farm on Sunday, December 11, 1881. A month later, on Sunday, January 15, 1882, the Constitution published another article attributed to Burr titled “Booth’s Romance”.

This article was similar to the earlier article found in the Evening Star, but “Booth’s Romance” is markedly different in spots from “Booth’s Bullet.” The section about visiting Booth’s grave is not present in the Constitution, and while the interviews with John T. Ford and John Mathews are present, they have been moved around, reworded, and elaborated on in different places.

For example, here is the beginning of “Booth’s Romance”:

“‘Oh! If it were not for that girl how clear the future would be to me! How easily could I grasp the ambition closest to my heart! With what a fixed and resolute purpose, beyond all resistance, could I do and dare anything to accomplish the release of the confederate prisoners! Thus reviving the drooping southern armies, and giving new heart to the waning cause!

What are those lines in Romeo and Juliet describing love? I have played them an hundred times, but they are now covered with the mist of greater thoughts and I cannot see them. I am, I am in love!’

‘O! any thing of nothing first create!
Oh! heavy lightness! serious vanity!
Mis-shapen chaos of well seeming forms!’
quoted an actor associate and friend into whose room John Wilkes Booth had strode one morning in April, 1865, and thrown himself upon the bed, his mind torn with conflicting emotions.”

In content, this introduction is similar to the exchange between Booth and John Mathews as written in “Booth’s Bullet,” but it is portrayed and narrated differently in “Booth’s Romance.” A similar change is present in the part about Booth’s breakfast. “Booth’s Romance” does not talk about Booth’s breakfast in the same section as John T. Ford’s interview but merely narrates Booth’s movements uncredited:

“About 10 o’clock in the morning of the day upon which the crime was committed Booth came down the steps of the hotel to the breakfast room, late as an actor’s wont. Immaculately dressed in a full suit of dark clothes, with tall silk hat, kid gloves and cane, he walked forth the young Adonis of the stage… At the foot of the stairs he met his fiancee, who was there awaiting his coming. They walked into the breakfast room, and took their morning meal together. A few minutes chat in the parlor followed. Those words were doubtless the last she ever spoke to him.”

In this version, Booth and Lucy Hale definitively shared breakfast together before they departed from each other’s company. However, there is no attribution for this added detail, and it appears to be an unsupported elaboration. “Booth’s Romance” is filled with confusing attributions when compared to “Booth’s Bullet”. For example, in the section cited as the interview with John T. Ford, we get this exchange:

“‘He was received by the very best people. The lady to whom he was engaged to be married belonged to the elite of Washington society.’
‘Do you know the lady’s name?’
‘Yes, but it shall be sacred. She is married now and it would do no good to the truth of history to revive it. Booth’s whole soul was centered upon her, and he loved her as few men love. Her picture, I understand, was taken from his body a short time after his capture, and she was faithful to him to the very last.'”

These statements are said to be from John T. Ford, but the ending part about Lucy Hale’s name being “sacred” was attributed to John Mathews in the article “Booth’s Bullet.” It appears the composer of “Booth’s Romance” combined the two statements by Ford and Mathews together and attributed them all to Ford. However, without access to Burr’s original work in the Philadelphia Press, it’s hard to know which account, if either, is the accurate portrayal.

Regardless, these articles from Frank Burr seem to provide John T. Ford as the source for the claim that John Wilkes Booth shared his breakfast with Lucy Hale on April 14, 1865. But how reliable is that story?


It’s important to remember that John T. Ford was not in Washington, D.C., on the day of the assassination. In truth, Ford was not all that involved with the day-to-day operations of his namesake theater. He had spent most of the winter and spring of 1864-1865 in Baltimore, running his Holliday Street Theatre. He left the management of Ford’s Theatre in the hands of his brothers, Harry and Dick Ford. When Lincoln was shot at Ford’s Theatre, John T. Ford was in Richmond. Before the war, Ford had operated a theater in Richmond, and he still had family in the area. With the fall of the Confederate capital earlier that month, Ford had applied for and received a military pass to travel south. All of John Ford’s knowledge about the specifics of the assassination comes from what he learned from his brothers, employees, and eyewitnesses after his return to the city.

This isn’t to say that John T. Ford is someone we should ignore. While he wasn’t in town when Lincoln was shot, when he returned to Washington, Ford was arrested and held at the Old Capitol Prison. He wrote a great deal about his time in prison and his interactions with some of the other folks imprisoned with him. Ford became a big proponent of Mary Surratt’s innocence as a result of what he witnessed while incarcerated.

In April of 1889, John T. Ford published an article in the North American Review entitled, “Behind the Curtain of a Conspiracy”. If you want, you can read the full article here. The bulk of the piece was a defense of Mary Surratt and an attack on Judge Advocate General Joseph Holt for allowing Mrs. Surratt to be executed. However, Ford also took the time to narrate John Wilkes Booth’s movements on the morning of the assassination. When discussing Booth’s breakfast, John T. Ford wrote this:

“On the morning of April 14, 1865, it was fully 11 a.m. when John Wilkes Booth came from his chamber and entered the breakfast-room at the National Hotel, Washington. He was the last man at breakfast that day; one lady only was in the room, finishing her morning meal. She knew him and responded to his bow of recognition. He breakfasted leisurely, left the room when he had finished, went to the barber-shop…”

Ford makes no mention of Lucy Hale in this 1889 article. His allusion to a single lady in the breakfast room more closely matches GATH’s description of Carrie Bean from 1865.

The reality is that John T. Ford was extremely inconsistent when discussing Booth’s breakfast over the years. In an article from 1878, he stated that Booth, “was the last guest at breakfast” and makes no mention of any ladies being present. To Col. Burr in 1881, he stated that Lucy Hale met Booth at breakfast, but it is unclear if she joined him for the meal. Then, in 1889, he wrote that another unnamed lady was also eating breakfast at the time. John T. Ford is all over the map.

Perhaps the most interesting of all of John T. Ford’s descriptions of Booth’s breakfast is one that he gave to the Evening Star on April 18, 1885. In this account, Ford includes both Carrie Bean and Lucy Hale.

“The last male guest at the National hotel breakfast, on the morning of April 14th, 1865, was John Wilkes Booth. When he entered the breakfast room, a young lady, Miss B—. was finishing her meal at a small table near by the one assigned him by the waiter in charge. He glanced over the bill of fare and pleasantly whispered his order for a light meal, which was soon brought. The young lady lingered at her table. The young actor was an acquaintance, and a known admirer of one of her feminine friends – (the daughter of a distinguished public man, whose family occupied a suite of rooms at the same hotel,) besides he was young graceful, and exceedingly handsome. His breakfast was soon finished, he rose as the lady did, and they walked together to the door, where his silk hat, light overcoat, cane and gloves were lying on a table. He laid the coat on his left arm, and with hat, gloves and cane in his hands, he bowed to the young lady and passed along the hall way and down the steps to the office, placing his hat and coat on and leisurely gloving one hand, he noticed that it was after eleven by the hotel clock, as he sauntered towards the door on the Avenue. At this time two handsomely dressed young ladies were passing – he bowed, they acknowledged the salutation and entered the parlor hallway of the hotel. Had any one been looking on when he drew and opened an encased picture from a side pocket, the likeness of one of the two ladies would have been recognized in the subject of the ambrotype. He quickly replaced the picture in his pocket, and started in an easy loitering walk towards 6th street…”

Ford paints a compelling and almost theatrical scene in this article. Booth shares a meal in the same room as an acquaintance, Carrie Bean, who admires the matinee idol and delays completing her meal so that they will finish at the same time. Always the gentleman, Booth escorts Carrie Bean from the breakfast room and bids her adieu. Preparing to depart the hotel, Booth comes across Lucy Hale, his secret fiancee, with an escort, most likely her sister Lizzie. The public nature of their meeting in the hotel parlor, along with Lizzie’s presence, prevents the lovers from acknowledging each other with anything beyond the same polite pleasantries Booth had just demonstrated with Miss Bean. But the couple still lock eyes and exchange a knowing smile. As the Hale sisters pass him, Booth takes out the image of Lucy he keeps on his person, the same image that will later be found in his pocket diary upon his death. Booth looks upon Lucy’s face before placing it in his pocket. He exits the National Hotel on his way to Ford’s Theatre where he will get confirmation that Lincoln would be attending that night, altering his future, and Lucy’s, forever. If I were to direct such a scene, I pan away from the hotel door after Booth exits out onto the street and turn back to Lucy Hale. Lizzie would be prattling on about something innocuous but our focus would be on Lucy’s face, which would still be a bit blushed from having a small moment of connection with her secret fiancee. She continues ignoring Lizzie and looks at the door Booth exited out of, longing for him to come back. But she never sees him again.

It’s a scene worthy of a theater owner and a pair of star-crossed lovers like John Wilkes Booth and Lucy Hale, but this account is likely just as fictitious as Romeo and Juliet. While John T. Ford no doubt took an interest in learning as much as he could about the events that led up to the President’s assassination at his namesake theater, his absence from the city on the day in question, and his many contradictions throughout the years, make it impossible to put any faith in his accounts regarding Booth’s breakfast. Sadly, aside from John T. Ford, I have been unable to find any compelling evidence to support the idea that John Wilkes Booth had breakfast with Lucy Hale on the morning of April 14, 1865. I don’t believe John Wilkes Booth dined with Lucy Hale that morning. At what point the pair saw each other for the last time will likely always be a mystery.


Epilogue

When I first started reading and doing research about the Lincoln assassination, I avoided the topic of John Wilkes Booth’s romantic entanglements like the plague. Booth was rumored to have been involved with so many different women that the late Dr. Ernie Abel wrote an entire 352-page book about them all. Booth engaged in numerous flings with women that he merely used and then disposed of. While Lucy Hale appears to have been a special case, I still don’t believe that Booth had the capacity to make any long-term relationship work, especially a marriage. Booth was a narcissist with an insatiable desire to be admired and revered. While Booth tried to portray Lincoln’s assassination as an act of justice for the South, it was more an attempt for glory and immortality for himself. Even if he had chosen not to assassinate Lincoln, I believe his relationship with Lucy was still doomed. Booth’s inability to feel fulfilled by any single person would have caused him to stray and ruined Lucy’s life as a result.

With that being said, I do believe that John Wilkes Booth thought he loved Lucy Hale. I say he thought he loved her because I don’t know how capable Booth was of truly loving someone other than himself. Booth’s version of love was not enough to stop him from killing Lincoln, but I believe he did think of Lucy Hale during his final days on the run. In fact, I think he left a final message for Lucy in his diary.

As mentioned earlier, before committing his crime, John Wilkes Booth left a lengthy letter for publication in the newspapers. This was his detailed explanation of why he had taken the drastic action of killing the President. John Mathews destroyed the letter shortly after the assassination for fear of being connected to the crime. While on the run from the authorities, the assassin clambered for newspapers and was dejected to find his words had not been published. Perhaps predicting that he would not survive long enough to try and justify his actions to the world in person, Booth decided to compose another manifesto. With a notable lack of paper, John Wilkes Booth was forced to take down his thoughts in his small datebook from 1864. It was in a pocket of this datebook that he held Lucy Hale’s photograph. Booth ripped out the previously used pages and started the datebook fresh, labeling his main entry as “April 14, Friday the Ides”.

Much has been written about the text of John Wilkes Booth’s diary. Yet, a central section of his diary has been mainly ignored in practically all analyses of his motivations, mindset, and mood. Before writing anything about his deed or his reasonings, Booth opens his diary with two words that stand alone.

The words are “Ti Amo“. The phrase is Italian and translates to, “I love you.”

If Booth had written “I love you” in English, the message could be interpreted as being for anyone, a final note to his mother and siblings perhaps. But writing the phrase as “Ti Amo” codes this phrase in a way that makes it more specific. It is intended for a specific person, who, upon reading it, should know it was for them and them alone.

I contend that this “Ti Amo” was Booth’s final message for Lucy Hale. We know that Lucy was learning Spanish in preparation for her family’s departure to Spain. John Wilkes Booth traveled from D.C. to New York City in March of 1865 in order to visit Lucy, who was taking Spanish lessons in the city. While “Ti Amo” is Italian and not Spanish, it is only one letter different from the Spanish phrase for “I love you”. Perhaps Booth meant to write the Spanish “Te Amo” but ended up with the Italian “Ti Amo” by mistake. Or perhaps the Italian version was a playful response to Lucy’s own “Te amo”. In my view, writing “I love you” in a foreign language in his diary was a way for Booth to announce his love specifically for Lucy without endangering her further by mentioning her name. I might be giving John Wilkes Booth more romantic credit than I should, but I truthfully cannot think of who else this message was meant for other than his secret fiancee, Lucy Hale.

Categories: History | Tags: , , , , , , | 7 Comments

A Public Service Announcement

Categories: History | Tags: , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Breakfast with Booth: Carrie Bean

On the night of April 13, 1865, Washington, D.C. was a city of jubilation. The nation’s capital was decked out in beautiful displays of celebration and light. Described as the Grand Illumination, countless businesses and private homes burned candles and were lavishly decorated in order to mark the essential end of the Civil War due to Confederate General Robert E. Lee’s surrender to Union General Ulysses S. Grant on April 9th. The event brought many visitors to D.C. and the streets were filled with revelers until late into the night.

Among the throng of people who viewed the Grand Illumination in all its grandeur was a solemn and dejected John Wilkes Booth. The cheering and good humor of the citizens of Washington was nothing but a reminder to Booth that his prior months’ plan to abduct President Lincoln and surrender him to the Confederacy had come to naught. With the war being celebrated as practically over, Booth had to admit to himself that he had done nothing substantive on behalf of his cause.

At around 2:00 a.m., Booth returned to his rented room at the National Hotel. He composed a quick note to his mother stating of the illumination, “Everything was bright and splendid. More so in my eyes if it had been a display in a nobler cause. But so goes the world. Might makes right.” With that, Booth retired.

Booth’s whereabouts in the subsequent hours leading up to the assassination of Abraham Lincoln have long been the subject of study. We know several of the places he visited during this time – such as Ford’s Theatre to get his mail and the Surratt boarding house to ask Mrs. Surratt to take a package to her tavern for him. However, creating a minute-by-minute timeline of his movements is difficult as witnesses sometimes place him in contradictory places at the same time. Arthur Loux has done the best job of trying to establish Booth’s routine on assassination day with his book John Wilkes Booth: Day By Day. Still, plenty of uncertainties remain.

One example that demonstrates the unknowns regarding Booth and his movements on assassination day is in regard to his earliest of tasks: eating breakfast.


The first source that attempts to explain Booth’s breakfast on April 14, 1865, is journalist George Alfred Townsend. GATH, as he was known, was a correspondent for The World newspaper out of New York City. On the night of Lincoln’s assassination, GATH was actually in Richmond, having arrived shortly after the Confederate capital fell. After the news of Lincoln’s assassination reached Richmond, GATH quickly returned to Washington. From there, he wrote several dispatches to The World, detailing the crime, manhunt, capture of Booth, and the eventual trial of the conspirators. GATH had good relationships with civilians, government leaders, and military officers alike. As a result, he was able to compose fairly detailed reports back to his readers.

On April 28, 1865, The World published a biographical article about John Wilkes Booth written by GATH. The lengthy biography ended with a paragraph titled “Closing Scenes” which stated:

“On the morning of the murder, Booth breakfasted with Miss Carrie Bean, the daughter of a merchant and a very respectable young lady, at the National Hall. He arose from the table at, say eleven o’clock. During this breakfast, those who watched him say that he was very lively, piquant and self-possessed as ever in his life.”

While GATH does not provide the source for his knowing that Booth dined with “Miss Carrie Bean”, the entire article about Booth was supposedly “complied for The World from the statements of his personal friends and companions”. GATH’s knack for sniffing out details had always served him well. In this instance, I’m willing to believe that GATH visited the National Hotel himself and heard the story from some people there.

So who was this Carrie Bean that GATH wrote about? Well, for the longest time, I believed that Carrie Bean was this woman buried in D.C.’s Congressional Cemetery. I’ve visited her grave in the past and even had her marked on my Lincoln assassination maps as the woman who might have shared breakfast with the assassin of Lincoln.

However, as I was researching for this piece, I became less and less convinced that the Carrie Bean buried in Congressional Cemetery is the correct woman. GATH described Carrie Bean as a “Miss”, “young”, and the “daughter of a merchant”. Congressional Carrie doesn’t really fit any of these descriptors. Her father, Thomas Copeland, had been dead since 1856. He was never a merchant but spent most of his career as a “master machinist and engineer of the U.S. Navy Yard.” Next, Congressional Carrie wouldn’t have been considered all that “young” by Victorian standards. At the time of Lincoln’s assassination, she was 34 years old and the mother of three children. Her first husband, William Bean, had died ten years previously. Lastly, in 1862, Carrie remarried a man named John Russell. Thus, in 1865, Congressional Carrie was technically Mrs. Carrie Russell. While she did have a similar name as the person referred to by GATH, it no longer seems possible for her to have been the one he was writing about.

Trying to track down the identity of GATH’s “Miss Carrie Bean” has been quite a struggle as his description provided so little to go on. However, after following up on many false leads over the course of two weeks, I think I have actually found the person he was referencing. If you’ll indulge me, I’d like to walk you through my research process on this. I did not take the most linear path, but I still believe I managed to find the most likely candidate.


My investigation started when I saw a version of the following image attached to the FindaGrave page for Carrie Bean Russell buried at Congressional Cemetery:

This drawing comes from the cover of the March 23, 1861 edition of Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper. On this cover several of the ladies who attended President Lincoln’s first inaugural ball are shown, wearing their beautiful gowns.

Now, this labeled image seems to be proof that Congressional Carrie was quite the socialite and had attended Lincoln’s inauguration in 1861, thus making it more likely she could have later rubbed elbows with John Wilkes Booth at the National Hotel. However, attributing this image to Carrie Bean Russell is yet another case of mistaken identity.

What bothered me about Carrie’s drawing was how some of the other ladies present on the cover had their home cities listed, while Carrie Bean did not. For example, the lady right next to Carrie is “Miss White, of Washington” and two ladies down from her is “Mrs. Frank Smith, of Boston”. Yet Carrie and others on the page are not attributed to a certain city. I found a digitized copy of the whole issue on the Internet Archive and flipped through the pages. Near the end of the issue is the article about the inaugural ball and its attendees. The dresses of the different ladies on the cover are described, some more than others. The description for Carrie Bean is short but provides one key piece of information. It states: “Miss Bean, of New York, in white tarletan.”

Suddenly things made sense. Frank Leslie’s was a New York City paper. Thus, Carrie Bean and the other New York ladies present on the cover did not need any introduction to the paper’s New York audience. Only the ladies from outside of New York got special treatment.

I decided to try and track down this Carrie Bean of New York. While Frank Leslie’s only placed her in D.C. in March of 1861, I was hoping that she might have had enough clout to get another invitation to Lincoln’s second inauguration in March of 1865, just one month before his assassination. Plus, since GATH was writing for the New York World, it would make sense for him to include this detail about Booth’s breakfast since it involved a New Yorker.

Doing different searches for “Carrie Bean” and “New York” provided several newspaper articles that appeared to be the subject in question, but none of them really provided more information on who she was. However, they all helped establish that Miss Bean was a well-known socialite who hobnobbed with important figures of the day, many of whom had connections to the National Hotel. For example, in February of 1864, “Miss Bean, of New York” attended a ball in Washington, D.C. put on by General Gouverneur Warren in honor of the II Corps of the Union Army. The exclusive event was attended by Vice President Hanibal Hamlin, General George Meade, Senator John P. Hale “and daughter” (Lucy Hale, perhaps?), along with other senators and generals. Steve Williams, a fellow researcher on Roger Norton’s Lincoln Discussion Symposium, found the following article describing “Mrs. Bean and Miss Bean” attending a reception at the home of Ohio Senator John Sherman in February of 1865. The guest list was the very elite of Washington society:

In February of 1865, Senators James Harlan of Iowa and John P. Hale of New Hampshire were both living at the National Hotel. The fact that these Senators were connected to Miss Bean and her mother enough to include them in their party or escort one of them made it seem like I was on the right track. This reception took place just two months before the assassination of Lincoln.

It must be remembered that Washington became a bustling city as a result of the Civil War and the hotel industry there boomed. It was common for people to engage in long hotel stays in those days. Politicians especially lived out of hotels and boarding houses while Congress was in session, only to return to their home states when in recess. The Vice President didn’t have an official residence in D.C. until the 1970s, which is why Andrew Johnson was living at the Kirkwood House hotel at the time of Lincoln’s death. But long hotel stays were not limited to politicians. John Wilkes Booth had been residing at the National Hotel for months before the assassination. Correspondents from all the nation’s papers lived full-time in D.C. hotels. Lawyers with business in the federal courts spent weeks or months living out of hotels waiting for their cases to come up. Countless lobbyists, salespeople, and contract-type employees in connection with the federal government took up residence in hotels rather than purchasing property. If you had the money, then staying long-term at a hotel was the way to go.

Despite these and other finds showing that Miss Bean of New York was a known social figure in Washington during the Civil War years, I still lacked any additional identifying information. A big break came from a couple of articles that were published by GATH in June of 1865. These articles had nothing to do with the assassination but covered the annual examinations at the United States Military Academy in West Point, NY. The West Point examinations were a celebrated public event in which members of the public watched as the cadets were drilled and tested. In the first article, GATH included the name of “Miss Carrie Bean” among the ladies who had helped to make the examinations a successful social affair.

However, the big break came in the second article about the West Point examinations. It focused on the attendance of Generals Winfield Scott and Ulysses S. Grant at the trials. When GATH wrote out the list of visitors who watched as the cadets were tested in the academy’s library, he included the following:

“The ladies list included Mr. F. B. Conkling, Mrs. Sherwood, Mrs. Bigelow, the Misses Fish, Mrs. Strong, Mrs. Lavery, and many of equal social prominence, Mrs. Carrie Bean, Miss Roe and other bright faces represented the Highlands.”

Ignoring the change in salutation for the moment, it was the note that this Carrie Bean and others “represented the Highlands” that finally gave me a lead.

The Highlands is the area right around West Point on either side of the Hudson River. The land here is technically part of the Appalachian Mountains, though most of the mountains here are quite low in comparison with other parts of the range. Still, along the Hudson River in this area, the land is quite hilly earning the name the Hudson Highlands. If GATH was writing truthfully, then Carrie Bean was a resident of this particular area of New York, which greatly narrowed down the search.

Armed with this information, I quickly found my most promising lead yet in the 1870 census. I found a 23-year-old named Cara Bean living in Phillipstown, NY which was located just across the Hudson River from West Point.

After spending over a week researching her and painstakingly creating her family tree, I’m very confident that this is the Carrie Bean referenced by GATH. Allow me to introduce you to her.


Cara Bean was the daughter of Aaron Hook Bean and Maria Louise Remer. Aaron was a New Hampshire native who moved to New York City with his brother, Moses Dudley Bean. The two men entered into the liquor business and quickly became successful merchants. After a few years, Dudley left the partnership, leaving Aaron with a successful solo business.

Aaron married Maria Remer in New York City in October of 1841. On December 22, 1842, the couple announced the birth of a daughter named Cara Louise. Two other children followed, Anabel in 1853, and Howard Dudley in 1857. In addition to his thriving liquor business, Aaron Bean got involved in other ventures. In 1844, Aaron’s sister Susan Bean Marston, a widow with two children, married Thomas “Peg Leg” Ward of Austin, Texas. Ward was a celebrated figure in Texas as a result of his having lost a leg in the fight for Texas independence. While the marriage between Ward and Susan Bean would later prove to be acrimonious and abusive, in the first few years Ward was a celebrated member of the family. Aaron used his brother-in-law’s fame and reputation to jump-start more business ventures. As a merchant, Aaron provided patent documents and clerical supplies to Ward when the latter was engaged as a Texas Land Commissioner. Aaron also invested in the Galveston, Houston, and Henderson Railroad bringing him further financial success. In the 1860 census, Aaron Bean’s real estate holdings were valued at $300,000 and his personal estate was valued at around $50,000. It was in this way that Cara Bean, her siblings, and her cousins, all lived a life without want.

When Cara Bean began living the life of a young socialite is unclear. Her family certainly had the money to support such a lifestyle. While they were New York residents, the Bean family were no strangers to the nation’s capital. Aaron Bean’s name can be found on the arrival lists of various D.C. hotels starting as early as 1853. On the last day of February 1861, Aaron Bean checked into Clay’s Hotel in Washington. Cara Bean joined her father in the city as preparations for Lincoln’s inauguration were underway.

In support of this claim is a letter written by Blanche Butler, the daughter of future Union General Benjamin Butler. In 1861, 14-year-old Blanche was attending boarding school in Washington. She regularly corresponded with her father and mother back home in Massachusetts. On March 11, 1861, Blanche wrote a letter to her mother about the events surrounding Lincoln’s inauguration and her attendance at the inaugural ball. In the letter, she mentions Carrie Bean and Clay’s Hotel specifically:

“[Uncle] came over quite early in the morning, and we had breakfast at Clay’s Hotel, with the Misses Bean, and we stood on the balcony all the morning and saw the procession go by; then Uncle took me up to Mr. Baker’s and there he decided that I had better go to the Ball; although I was not anxious to do so. Carrie Bean lent me a white muslin dress, which with a cherry sash, white gloves, a cherry and white fan, a pair of white kid slippers with little rosettes on the top, completed my outfit. We went about half past nine and returned at half past three. As I refused to dance every set but one, ate a very light supper, I did not experience any ill effects from it excepting a slight cold, which you know was impossible to avoid.”

Blanche Butler was the beneficiary of Carrie Bean’s kindness in lending the young girl a dress and the two joined the other celebrants at the ball on March 4. But it was Carrie, not Blanche, who got her dress memorialized in the pages of Frank Leslie’s.

When the Civil War broke out, Aaron Bean sold many of his business assets, including his lucrative liquor business. With the funds, he purchased the 252-acre piece of property near West Point, NY where the family is found in the 1870 census. However, Aaron Bean was not completely divested of all his businesses. In the middle of the war, Aaron partnered with a cousin of his named Moses Hook Bean to lease the former Clay’s Hotel in D.C. and run it as the United States Hotel. Aaron was also active in pushing for an expansion of the D.C. street car system. His name was on a list of incorporators for a line that would connect the Navy Yard to Georgetown. Aaron’s business interests in D.C. meant that the family had plenty of reasons to return to Washington. The various mentions of “Miss Bean” at different social gatherings in D.C. make it clear that Cara was easily able to ingratiate herself with important members of Washington society during the Civil War years.

Elizabeth “Libbie” Custer

In the spring of 1864, a new woman came to reside in Washington. Her name was Elizabeth “Libbie” Custer, and she was the wife of Major General George Armstrong Custer. The Custers had just married in February of ’64, but George’s duties to the Union army had cut their honeymoon short. Libbie, a Michigan native, was brand new to the capital city but her husband’s service at the Battle of Gettysburg had made him famous. Thus, she was quickly welcomed by the political elite of the city.

Given that both ladies ran in the same social circles, it was only inevitable that Libbie Custer and Cara Bean would meet. When this happened exactly is unclear but soon the pair had formed a friendship. In addition, Libbie became friends with Cara’s cousin, Fanny. Blanche Butler mentioned the “Misses Bean” in the plural when writing her letter in 1861. Cara Bean was 18 years old at the time of Lincoln’s first inauguration while her younger sister, Anabel, was only about 8. It’s possible that Anabel joined her sister for that trip to Washington, but I posit that there is also a chance that Blanche was referring to Cara’s cousin, Fanny.

Fanny Ellen Bean was the daughter of Moses Dudley Bean and his wife Mary Curtis. The two cousins, practically identical in age, grew up together. Aaron and Dudley’s families are shown all living together under the same roof in the 1850 and 1860 censuses. Fanny was close to Cara their whole lives and when Fanny died in 1899, she left Cara part of her estate.

Cara Bean appears to have become quite close with the Custers. It is because of them that we actually have a picture of Cara Bean. According to photography expert D. Mark Katz, on October 23, 1864, Libbie, Custer, and “Cora” Bean posed together for this photograph in Mathew Brady’s studio in Washington:

Here’s a close-up of Cara Bean from a different copy of this image:

If the date this photograph is attributed to is correct, then this is Cara Bean as she appeared just a couple months shy of her 22nd birthday.

I found this image fairly early on in my research. However, the name attributed to this image is “Miss Cora Bean”. During my initial searches, I found a couple mentions of Cora Bean but I had no way of knowing if this was the same person as the Carrie Bean mentioned by GATH and featured on the cover of Frank Leslie’s. For a time, I had actually dismissed all the references to Cora Bean entirely as I found that there was a Cora L. Bean from New York who was alive during the Civil War.

However, when I discovered Cara L. Bean and saw how easily her unique name could be confused for Cora (and how it often was when she was older), I delved more into the other Cora Bean. It ends up that Cora and Cara were second cousins. Cora was the daughter of Cotton Ward Bean, a cousin of Aaron H. Bean. But beyond the family connection, the important thing I learned is that Cora Bean wasn’t born until 1858. That means she would have only been about 6 when this picture with the Custers was taken. But it’s clear that the person in this photograph is not 6 years old. This photograph cannot be of the actual Cora L. Bean. It must be of Cara L. Bean. This helped establish the fact that, in addition to Carrie and Cara, I had another name I would have to search for in order to flesh out her life story.

The shared photograph is not the only connection between the Custers and Cara Bean. In March of 1866, George Custer was in New York without Libbie. On March 29th, George wrote a letter to Libbie recounting his activities. Libbie’s biographer, Shirley Leckie, summarized the contents of the letter in her book:

“[George] took Cora [sic] and Fannie Bean, two of Libbie’s friends, to dinner and shopping. Later the three attended Maggie Mitchell’s performance in Little Barefoot. The blond actress had become one of the most popular figures on stage, following her role in Fanchon, the Cricket, a play she now owned. During curtain calls, Custer and the two young women threw a bouquet with a card: ‘from an admiring trio.'”

Leckie continues, describing how a few days later on April 5th, Custer and the Bean cousins attended a Bal d’Opera at the Academy of Music. This was a masquerade ball in which Custer dressed up as the devil. Later, he wrote to Libbie noting Thomas Nast had drawn the scene of the ball and that a caricature of his costume was published in Harper’s Weekly. While the drawing doesn’t seem to capture either Cara or Fanny Bean, here apparently is George Armstong Custer as the devil.

General Custer was famously killed at the Battle of the Little Bighorn in 1876. A year later, his body was shipped to New York for burial at West Point Cemetery. According to newspaper articles, Libbie was attended at the funeral by her friend, Cora [sic] Bean.

The Custers were not the only individuals with whom Cara Bean established a friendship during the Civil War years. As mentioned before Senator James Harlan of Iowa had resided at the National Hotel in 1864 and 1865 and was connected to the Beans. In the early years of the war, he had lived at Clay’s Hotel, another usual haunt of the Beans. Senator Harlan’s eldest child was Mary Eunice Harlan. She was born in 1846 and was educated both in Iowa and in Washington due to her father’s position as Senator. At some point during her months in Washington, Mary Harlan met Cara Bean, likely because they ran in the same circles and often boarded at the same hotels. In 1864, a courtship began between Mary Harlan and Robert Todd Lincoln. At his father’s second inaugural ball, Robert Lincoln escorted Mary Harlan as his date. The two were planning a wedding when Abraham Lincoln’s assassination occurred. For a time, it looked like their courtship was over as a result. Eventually, however, the two renewed their courtship and on September 24, 1868, Robert Lincoln and Mary Harlan were married.

Mary Harlan in her wedding dress

By this time the Harlans had ceased living out of hotels and so the wedding was held at their home on H Street in Washington. While the wedding of Lincoln’s eldest child would have been the most celebrated event in Washington, the couple decided to keep it very small. They only invited about thirty of their closest friends. It was a very exclusive event but one person who made the cut was Cara Bean. Her outfit for the wedding was described in the D.C. papers:

“Miss Cora [sic] Bean, of New York, was dressed in white French mouslin, elegantly embroidered over a purple silk, with amethyst necklace, earrings and bracelets. Her dress was made in the latest and most fashinable [sic] style.”

From these examples, it’s clear that Cara Bean was an active participant in the social circles of Washington, D.C. during the Civil War years.

After the Civil War ended, it appears that Cara Bean returned home to New York to live at the family’s estate near West Point. References to her in the D.C. papers end with Robert Lincoln’s marriage in 1868. In 1879, the Beans sold their estate and moved back into New York City. In the 1880 census, Cara, her parents, and her brother are all living in a hotel. Also boarding in the same hotel is Cara’s cousin Fanny. Aaron Bean died in 1883 and was buried in Woodlawn Cemetery in the Bronx.

Cara Bean never married. In the 1890s she lived with her widowed mother and fellow spinster cousin Fanny at The Albany, an apartment complex on Broadway and 51st streets in New York City. Yet she was still engaged in social activities. She was a patron of the music scene and contributed her time and money to worthwhile causes, especially those catering to needy children.

1899 – 1900 was a period of great loss to Cara Bean. Her cousin Fanny died in November of 1899. A month later, her mother Maria also passed. Six months after that her brother Howard Dudley died. By 1901, she was alone at The Albany. Cara sought company with the only close relative she had left, her sister Anabel. The younger middle Bean sibling was the only one who had children. Anabel lived with her husband Edward Leavitt in Stamford, Connecticut. Cara Bean departed New York City to live with her sister and her five nieces and nephews.

On November 16, 1902, Cara Louise Bean died at the home of her sister in Stamford. She was 59 years old. Her obituary in the New York Times was short but did recount how Cara and her cousin Fanny (misidentifed as Blanche) were, “well known in New York society”.

Cara Bean’s body was transported back to New York and she was interred in Woodlawn Cemetery with her parents.


I believe that the “Miss Carrie Bean” described by George Alfred Townsend in his article about John Wilkes Booth was Cara Louse Bean of New York. The pieces of Cara Bean’s life and influence in D.C. society all seem to fit GATH’s description of that, “daughter of a merchant and a very respectable young lady”. Cara Bean knew and interacted with so many important figures in D.C. society. She resided for long periods of time at the National Hotel. She went to parties and balls with the daughters of Senators like Mary Harlan and Lucy Hale. She was escorted to events by the like of Lincoln’s private secretary John Hay and was well known to Robert Todd Lincoln. I have no doubt in my mind that Cara Bean also knew the famous actor, John Wilkes Booth.

With that being said, nothing in my research can definitively prove GATH’s claim that Cara Bean ate breakfast with John Wilkes Booth on the morning of April 14, 1865. I think it’s certainly possible that she did, but without another witness or something from Cara herself attesting to the shared meal, we can never be sure.

I never intended to do this deep dive on Cara Bean. Remember, I originally thought the Carrie Bean mentioned in GATH’s article was the woman buried in Congressional Cemetery. Talking about Carrie Bean was supposed to be the quick and easy part of a completely different blog post. I was just going to mention Carrie Bean in order to give context to an interesting article I had stumbled across. You see, Carrie Bean is not the only person who was connected with John Wilkes Booth’s breakfast on April 14, 1865. In my next post, I’ll discuss the two other ladies who have been linked to the assassin’s breakfast. One of them has a doozy of a story:


References:
The family history of Cara Bean was assembled through documents accessible through Ancestry.com and newspaper articles accessed through GenealogyBank, Newspapers.com, and the Internet Archive.
“Right or Wrong, God Judge Me”: The Writings of John Wilkes Booth edited by John Rhodehamel and Louise Taper (1997)
“John Wilkes Booth and George Alfred Townsend: A Marriage Made in Hell?” by Terry Alford (1992)
Peg Leg: The Improbable Life of a Texas Hero, Thomas William Ward, 1807 – 1872 by David C. Humphrey (2009)
Chronicles from the Nineteenth Century: Family letters of Blanche Butler and Adelbert Ames, married July 21st, 1870 by Blanche Butler Ames (1957)
Custer in Photographs by D. Mark Katz (1985)
Elizabeth Bacon Custer and the Making of a Myth by Shirley Leckie (1993)
NYPL Digital Collections
Wikimedia Commons
Giant in the Shadows: The Life of Robert T. Lincoln by Jason Emerson (2012)
Proceedings of the John Bean (1660) Association at its Annual Reunion at Boston, September 5, 1900
Burial records from Woodlawn Cemetery
My thanks to Steve Williams and others at Roger Norton’s Lincoln Discussion Symposium for helping in my initial searches for Carrie Bean.

Categories: History | Tags: , , , , , , | 14 Comments

Some Upcoming Events 2023

A few interesting Lincoln assassination related events have popped up on the radar over the next couple of months that I wanted to share. I wish I lived near some of these so that I could attend them.


August 25, 2023

Boston, Massachusetts

Lincoln and Booth: Live Music Played to Film

“The West End Museum presents an unforgettable theatrical experience when members of the New England Film Orchestra combine the magic of film with the power of music as they perform live music in-sync to two films highlighting the lives of Abraham Lincoln and John Wilkes Booth.

Odie Henderson, Boston Globe Film Critic and author of ‘Black Caesars and Foxy Cleopatras: A History of Blaxploitation Cinema’ (out in January 2024), will join us to provide context for the films.

John Wilke’s Booth was in Boston in April of 1865, eight days before the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln. What the well-known actor was doing during those last fateful days is not altogether clear, but during that time was purportedly seen practicing his aim at a local shooting gallery.

The first firm is an early silent short by Thomas Edison from 1915 entitled “The Life of Abraham Lincoln,” which spans the famous president’s life from his marriage to his assassination by Booth. The second, “The Man in the Barn,” is a speculative docu-drama from 1937 that asks if John Wilkes Booth didn’t die by gunshot while trapped in a burning barn just days after Lincoln’s assassination, but rather escaped to live another 38 years.

Don’t miss this one-of-a-kind “surround-sound” movie event at Boston’s landmark Hub Hall, adjacent to TD Garden and North Station and boasting 18 diverse food and drink options for a before or after-movie snack.”

Cost: $15

Event page: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/lincoln-and-booth-live-music-played-to-film


September 23, 2023

Washington, D.C.

Smithsonian Booth Escape Route Bus Tour  [led by American Brutus author, Michael Kauffman!]

“Fleeing Ford’s Theatre on the night of April 14, 1865, John Wilkes Booth traveled through Maryland into Virginia, where, a few days later, he was found and fatally shot. Historian Michael Kauffman retraces Booth’s escape route and reveals the personalities and intrigues surrounding the Lincoln assassination.

Stops include Ford’s Theatre; the house near Clinton, Maryland, belonging to Mary Surratt, who was hanged for her involvement in the plot; and the house of Dr. Samuel A. Mudd, who set Booth’s broken leg.

Enjoy a seafood lunch at Captain Billy’s Crab House at Popes Creek Landing, near where Booth and co-conspirator David Edgar Herold crossed the Potomac. In Virginia, visit sites where they contacted local sympathizers and where Booth was captured and died.”

Cost: $170 for members, $220 for non members

Event page: https://smithsonianassociates.org/ticketing/tickets/booths-escape-route


October 15, 2023

Albany, New York

The Rathbones of Albany The Tragic Story of John Wilkes Booth’s Last Victim

Presented by the Friends of Albany Rural Cemetery

“Clara Harris and Henry Reed Rathbone were from prominent families in Albany. Each had wealth, education, and a bright future. Mark will reveal the sad, gruesome, yet true story of two local people who witnessed the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln first-hand, and the Cottage in Loudonville where ghostly apparitions have been reported.”

[Note from Dave: While Henry and Clara Rathbone are not buried at the Albany Rural Cemetery, their parents are. In addition, this cemetery is the final resting place of Absalom Bainbridge, one of the Confederate soldiers who met up with John Wilkes Booth and David Herold at Port Conway on April 24, 1865. Bainbridge assisted his cousin Mortimer Ruggles and a third Confederate, Willie Jett, in transporting Booth to the Garrett farm. Herold went with Bainbridge to spend the night at the home of Mrs. Clarke outside of Bowling Green. On the morning of April 25th, Bainbridge and Ruggles brought Herold back to the Garretts where they dropped him off. After seeing the Union soldiers crossing the ferry between Port Conway and Port Royal, Bainbridge and Ruggles raced back to alert Booth and Herold before fleeing themselves. If you attend this event, be sure to hunt down Bainbridge’s grave (and send me a photo of it). President Chester Arthur is buried here, too.]

Cost: Tickets don’t go on sale until September 24th

Event page: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-rathbones-of-albany-the-tragic-story-of-john-wilkes-booths-last-victim


October 21, 2023

Bel Air, Maryland

The Lincolns, the Booths, and the Spirits & The Forgotten Women of the Lincoln Assassination

“The Junius B. Booth Society (JBBS) and the Historical Society of Harford County, Inc. (HSHC) are holding an intriguing, one-of-a kind fundraising event titled  The Lincolns, the Booths, and the Spirits & The Forgotten Women of the Lincoln Assassination featuring author/historians Terry Alford and Kathryn Canavan on Saturday, October 21 at the Historical Society of Harford County.  This is a fundraiser and the proceeds will be split between JBBS and HSHC. All proceeds to JBBS will be used for the Tudor Hall museum. Seating is limited to 95 people, so reserve your seats now. Drinks and snacks will be provided. Following the closing remarks, the first floor of Tudor Hall, the childhood home of John Wilkes Booth will be open to attendees till 5:30 PM.

Terry Alford will present The Lincolns, the Booths, and the Spirits. Terry’s latest book, In the Houses of Their Dead, is the first book of the many thousands written about Lincoln to focus on the president’s fascination with Spiritualism (very popular in the Civil War era). Terry will demonstrate how it linked Lincoln, uncannily, to the man who would kill him. Abraham Lincoln is usually seen as a rational, empirically-minded man, yet as acclaimed scholar and biographer Terry Alford reveals, he was also deeply superstitious and drawn to the irrational. Like millions of other Americans, including the Booths, Lincoln and his wife, Mary, suffered repeated personal tragedies, and turned for solace to Spiritualism, a new practice sweeping the nation that held that the dead were nearby and could be contacted by the living. Remarkably, the Lincolns and the Booths even used the same mediums, including Charles Colchester, a specialist in “blood writing” whom Mary first brought to her husband, and who warned the president after listening to the ravings of another of his clients, John Wilkes Booth.

Kathryn Canavan is an independent researcher and the author of Lincoln’s Final Hours: Conspiracy, Terror, and the Assassination of America’s Greatest President. Kathryn will present The Forgotten Women of the Lincoln Assassination digging deep and uncovering surprising secrets and stories about some of the fascinating women connected to Lincoln’s assassination.”

Cost: $30

Event page: https://www.harfordhistory.org/event/the-booths-of-bel-air/

Categories: History, News | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

History’s Greatest Mysteries: The Escape of John Wilkes Booth

On December 5, 2020, the History Channel aired the fourth episode of their television show History’s Greatest Mysteries. This episode was called The Escape of John Wilkes Booth. And while it did have some reputable experts like Michael Kauffman who described the assassination and Booth’s subsequent 12 day escape, the almost hour and a half long episode mainly dealt with the plethora of conspiracy theories claiming that JWB escaped his death at the Garrett farm. Sadly, it seems like all the “documentaries” today that cover the Lincoln assassination story end up being about these very fringe and long discredited theories. When the episode first aired, I angrily tweeted from my friend Bob’s ottoman about the most obvious falsehoods as so many incorrect and illogical statements were presented alongside legitimate history.

The show seemed to be following the route of its injudicious “everything you have ever been told is a lie” predecessors which would inevitably end with a call to exhume JWB’s body on the basis of “evidence” that has been repeatedly and thoroughly debunked. While the very end of the episode did ultimately feature the hosts wondering if more information could be found by digging Booth up, just prior to that, this program pleasantly surprised me. They actually put some of these conspiracy theories to the test by using handwriting analysis and DNA comparison.

Below, I have excerpted a seven minute portion from near the end of the program that reveals their analysis of three theories presented in the show. These theories are: that David E. George was John Wilkes Booth (as claimed by Finis Bates), that John Wilkes Booth fathered children with Izola Martha Mills both before and after his supposed death, and a separate claim that John Wilkes Booth escaped and fathered a child that bore his own name. Give it a watch:

Let’s recap what we just saw there. First a handwriting expert looked at notarized document which stated, only at the end, that David E. George claimed to have been John Wilkes Booth just before his death. The expert concluded the document had been altered and the sentence describing George’s so called confession was added after the original had been notarized. The same expert also compared David E. George’s signature to known examples of John Wilkes Booth’s handwriting and found they did not match.

Next, the show used DNA from a descendant of Jane Booth Mitchell, Junius Brutus Booth’s sister, in order to see if various descendants of Martha Izola Mills are related to the Booth family. It was established that Booth descendant and the Mills descendants are not related. Then a similar comparison was done to a descendant who claimed John Wilkes Booth as her great great grandfather. Her father’s name was John Wilkes Booth III (and was actually interviewed by members of the Surratt Society in the 1980s). It was found that this descendant was also not related to the family of the real John Wilkes Booth.

In one fell swoop, History’s Greatest Mysteries actually did a huge favor to legitimate history by publicly discrediting these conspiracy theories. While it’s unfortunate that the important information uncovered is hidden in over an hour of misinformation, I’m still grateful they made some attempt to be objective and not just cater to sensationalism.

In this way, the show proved what close family and siblings of John Wilkes Booth knew all along. Their brother was killed at the Garrett farm on April 26, 1865. Even before he died, JWB was identified by photograph comparison at the Garrett farm and he had identifying items on his person. Despite the poor condition of his corpse by the time it got back to Washington, numerous friends, acquaintances, and his doctor further identified him on the USS Montauk. Finally, when his body was released to the family in 1869, his remains were once again identified by close theater friends who had known him for years and by his own brother, Joseph Booth. While some modern Booth relatives may wholeheartedly hope that their distant relative escaped his death, it’s just not so. Hopefully this program will help bring closure to a family that has long been abused by hucksters and frauds who attempted to use members of the Booth family to push their own agendas.

If you would like to watch the full episode, it’s available to purchase digitally on sites like Amazon and Google Play for like $2. You can also purchase season 1 & 2 of History’s Greatest Mysteries on DVD from Amazon for $10. If you are a subscriber to the Disney Plus streaming service, you can actually watch the episode for free. Just be warned that some of the “experts” featured on the show are really out there with their fantasies (i.e. the claim that Willie Jett shot “Booth”).

My friend Steve Miller refers to the Booth escaped conspiracy theories as rubber spiders. Like rubber spiders, no matter how hard you stomp on them, they just can’t be killed. I know that despite the mountain of evidence proving that John Wilkes Booth was killed at the Garret farm and is buried in the family plot at Green Mount Cemetery, people will continue to claim that Booth somehow escaped his own death. We’ll never be able to stomp out these stories for good. Still, I try to find solace in the fact that anyone who actually takes the time to investigate and evaluate these stories for themselves will quickly see that, like the rubber spiders, these conspiracy theories have never been real.

Categories: History | Tags: , , , , , | 10 Comments

Ben-Hur and John Wilkes Booth

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

In 1907, the first film adaptation of Ben-Hur was produced. Author Lew Wallace had written the highly successful book 15 years after he had served on the commission that tried & convicted the Lincoln assassination conspirators. Wallace had died in 1905 & early filmmakers usually ignored copyright laws anyway, so Kalem Company made their silent film without any approval or permission. While less than 15 minutes long, the film was a big success, largely due to the book’s ongoing popularity. You can watch it here:

The Wallace estate and the book’s publishers sued Kalem for copyright infringement. Surprisingly, the estate won their suit. This set the precedent still in place today that producers must acquire the film rights to copyrighted material before producing a movie.

But commissioner Lew Wallace as the source material is not the only connection the 1907 Ben-Hur film has to the Lincoln assassination. One of the co-directors of the film was a man named Frank Oakes Rose.

In 1869, a young Rose was a stock actor for John T. Ford in Baltimore. On Feb. 17, 1869, John T. Ford closed rehearsal early, beckoning a select few to follow him to an establishment behind the Holliday St. Theatre. While not invited, Frank Oakes Rose, along with fellow actor William Burton, scaled a fence and followed Ford & the others.

Rose & Burton found themselves among a group of about 25. They were all standing in Weaver’s undertaker shop, which was located behind the theater. There, the actors witnessed the final identification of John Wilkes Booth’s body which had just been shipped to Baltimore from D.C.

Rose observed as Joseph Booth helped to identify his brother using a gold plugged tooth in the skull of the remains. William Burton also volunteered that he had gone ice skating once with JWB. An investigation of the boot on the corpse’s foot had the same screw holes from the ice skate’s mounting. The same holes have been noted on the bottom of the boot on display at Ford’s Theatre.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Frank Oakes Rose never forgot the experience. Years later, when charlatans like Finis Bates tried to pass off an itinerate painter named David E. George as John Wilkes Booth, Rose told his story and his certainty the body he saw in 1869 was JWB.

Most of the Booth family found claims that JWB escaped his death at the Garrett farm to be ridiculous. Sydney Barton Booth, the son of Junius Brutus Booth, Jr. and Wilkes’ nephew, heard about Rose. In 1905, Sydney wrote to Rose, asking for his help in countering Bates & his lies.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I think it’s interesting that the movie that established the precedent for film rights was produced with stolen material from one the judges of the Lincoln conspirators and co-directed by a man who hopped a fence & stole a glance at the final identification of John Wilkes Booth.

Categories: History | Tags: , , , , | 10 Comments

William A. Howell and the Booths

Old actors love to reminisce about the old days. They love to tell stories about great actors they acted alongside and the great one-time performances that they took part in. This is especially true of smaller actors who never rose to the level of fame themselves and instead spent their careers in supporting roles to the star attractions.

William A. Howell was one of those small time actors. Born in Philadelphia in 1831, Howell got his start upon the stage as a $10 a week supporting player at the Arch Street Theatre in that city. By 1860, Howell had been hired by theater owner John T. Ford to work in his Holliday Street Theatre in Baltimore. His career on the stage was relatively short lived and did not extend beyond the Civil War, but during his time, Howell had acted alongside many of the greats.

By 1879, Howell had relocated to San Antonio, Texas where he worked in the railroad industry. But his favorite thing to do while in San Antonio was to reminiscence about his hey day in the theater. In 1906, a series of four articles were published in the San Antonio Daily Express about the life and theatrical memories of William Howell. The veteran actor told stories about many of the great actors of the past including Joseph Jefferson, Edwin Forrest, Charlotte Cushman, and John McCullough. In addition, Howell had a lot to say about the Booth family.

William Howell got his acting training through a private group in Philadelphia called the Boothenian Dramatic Association. The Boothenian was little more than a slap-dash theater school run by a couple former stock actors that operated out of an abandoned building. The group had no connection to Junius Brutus Booth or his kin, but the operators of the association knew that the name of Booth would help attract paying customers who wanted to learn the basics of acting. The Boothenian was one of several such “schools” with others bearing the names of the “Forrestonian”, “Byronean”, and “Shakespearean”. Such schools usually had brief lifespans. Still, in his later years, Howell was always proud to say he had been educated in the “Boothenian” school, thus showing his admiration for Junius Brutus Booth and his family.

What follows are the portions of Howell’s 1906 Daily Express articles that deal with the Booths. The digitized editions of the Daily Express that I had access to are very poor. I tried my best, but several times I was unable to decipher what the text was meant to have said. At those instances I have inserted the word [illegible].


January 7, 1906

Stealing the Family Skeleton: Reminiscences of William A. Howell, the Veteran Actor – Tells About Traits of Character of Some of the Other Actors He Supported and Things They Did.

This was the first of four articles containing Howell’s memories, but aside from mentioning he acted alongside Edwin and John Wilkes, there is nothing in this article that is pertinent to the Booths. Still, if you’re interested the full article can be read by clicking the title above.


January 14, 1906

Duke Saved by Big Bass Drum: Howell, the Veteran Retired Actor, Resumes His Reminiscences of Former Great Actors and Actresses – Joe Jefferson Was Delicate – Met England’s Monarch – Was With Wilkes Booth.

“…To very large and extremely appreciative audiences John Wilkes Booth was playing at the Holliday Street Theatre in Baltimore in 1861 and I was a member of the stock company that supported him. [Note: Booth was not starring in Baltimore in 1861. At the end of May, JWB returned home to Baltimore after a less than stellar starring engagement in the Southern States in which he was accidentally shot. It looks like Booth performed a single night at the Holliday Street Theatre alongside William Howell on May 16, 1861, which may be where this exaggeration comes from.] From his distinguished father, Junius Brutus Booth, he had inherited much of his histrionic talent and genius, but I fear that from the same source he inherited the impulses that made him take the terrible and misguided steps that he did when he murdered the Martyr President, Lincoln. Both he and his father were of moody and gloomy dispositions and morbid temperaments. I was much attached to Wilkes Booth. He and I occupied a room together and he frequently had long conversations with me in which he spoke of his love of liberty and of his father’s patriotism. Even at that time he was endeavoring to raise a military company in Maryland to take to Virginia and place in the cause of the South but I do not believe that he had at the time any idea of undertaking the terrible tragedy which he enacted in the box of Ford’s Theatre in Washington several years later. From what I saw of him and his abstraction, I am entitled to the belief that his mind was unbalanced. His expression at the time of the tragedy – Sic semper tyrannus – was not appropriate or in any way applicable to Lincoln whom he had just slain, because Lincoln was anything but a tyrant. On the contrary, that President was one of the greatest exponents of liberty this country has ever produced. The expression showed the frame of mind in which Wilkes Booth was when he killed the President. The Shakespearian play in which the killing of Caesar is portrayed and which is a very strong one, was one of Wilkes Booth’s favorites. In all probability he had devoted so much earnest study to it that it unhinged his mental balance and made him feel that he was enacting the scene of slaying Caesar when he took the life of Lincoln.

In the course of my professional career I met quite a number of prominent and distinguished people. Among those [illegible line] was the present King of England. I was introduced to him in company with John Wilkes Booth at Barnum’s Hotel in Baltimore by the Mayor of that city. This prominent [illegible] was then merely the Prince of Wales and only the heir apparent to the throne of Great Britain. He was quite a young man then, probably about my own age. But I noticed that he was even then a man of quick discernment. I heard him observe to the Mayor of Baltimore that Wilkes Booth appeared to him to be a very fascinating man. On that remark the young Prince was then eminently correct, for Booth exerted off the stage the same fascination he possessed on it. The Prince did not long remain in Baltimore. The Civil War had broken out and it was thought best for him to get out of the country before getting into any diplomatic entanglements that might possibly be presented. [Note: As intriguing as this story is, there is no way that JWB made the acquaintance of the Prince of Wales in Baltimore. The Prince only spent about 24 hours in Baltimore on Oct. 8-9, 1860. On those dates, JWB was performing in Columbus, Georgia.] Excitement was very high, too, about that time, and there was a very tough element in and around Baltimore just about then, which was in a very ugly mood. This element was very properly called the plug uglies. The sudden entrance into Baltimore of federal troops stopped Booth’s movement of raising a Confederate company. Soon after the Federal troops took possession of Baltimore, I returned to Philadelphia on a wood boat. I found Philadelphia also ablaze with excitement and war preparations were in progress.”


January 21, 1906

Was Not Sunset But Burning Opera House: Howell, the Actor, Resumes His Reminiscences of Booth, McCullough, Barrett, and Other Eminent Actors

The text of this article is very faded, making it difficult to decipher. Despite the title hinting that there was to be more about Booth, I was unable to find anything in this article that seems relevant. But perhaps I just couldn’t read the applicable parts. The article can be read by clicking the title above.


January 28, 1906

Booth and Howell Were Going to War: Wilkes Booth was to Have Been the Captain and Howell the Lieutenant. Booth’s Confederate Friends Captured Cannon to Fire on New York Troops – Edwin Booth’s Sore Trial.

This is the fourth and final of Howell’s 1906 articles. It is almost entirely about the the old actor’s connection to the Booths. As a result the entire article is transcribed below. As with the other articles, you can view the original text by clicking the title above.

“William A. Howell, the veteran retired actor, being still in a reminiscent vein, was asked by me to continue his relations of incidents connected with the careers of the various prominent people with whom he had appeared in the stage and did so:

“Just after the fall of Fort Sumter,” he said, “and after Baltimore was fairly ablaze with excitement, as I was going down the street I met Joe Booth. He was the youngest brother of John Wilkes Booth, and the youngest of the Booth brothers, of whom Edwin was the oldest [Note: Junius Brutus Booth, Jr. was the eldest of the Booth siblings]. Joe had been serving in the army as a surgeon at Charleston under the Confederacy. He was a quiet, dreamy, indolent sort of a fellow, who was always planning for something out of the usual trend of events for his own special benefit. He was the finest architect and constructor of air castles that I ever knew. He was chockfull of romance. He, however, had not inherited any of the histrionic talent of his father, Junius Brutus Booth. By Joe’s looks and manners I at once discovered he had something he considered of great importance to tell me. He acted as though he were afraid to speak of it on the street, fearing that someone in Baltimore might overhear it. My impression was at once confirmed by his asking me to come with him to his room at Barnum’s Hall.

Joseph Booth

As soon as we entered the room Joe locked the door. After satisfying himself that one one was peeping or prying he opened his trunk. Then he exposed to my view such a heterogenous make of trophies of war as I had never seen or hardly dreamed of, many of them horrible to contemplate. They gave me an idea of what a horrible affair war is. Joe showed me balls of rifles, pistols, and even of cannon. He had shells, and fragments of them. He also had pieces of human anatomy, bones and parts of skulls and other gruesome and [illegible] objects of grim-visaged war before its wrinkled front was in anywise smoothed out. These he had secured from the battlefield after the fight at Sumter between the fort and the ships. [Note: The fall of Fort Sumter was not a bloody battle, therefore it is likely the pieces of anatomy Joe had with him were specimens from the medical school where he had been studying when the conflict broke out]

His mother has sent Joe to attend the medical college at Charleston. He was there when the hostilities commenced, and he was able to get on the medical staff. Soon after I met him in Baltimore, I lost sight of him, for he made his way to Philadelphia, where his mother lived.

Very soon after Joe had gone from Baltimore to Philadelphia, John Wilkes Booth, his brother, made his appearance in Baltimore. He knew that I was playing in one of the theaters there so he came around to the theater to see me. John Wilkes Booth and his brother Joe were entirely dissimilar in disposition, and in every other way. Joe was [illegible] stupid or counterfeited stupidity to such perfection that I never was able to learn that he was otherwise. Wilkes was one of the brightest and most intelligent men in the theatrical world. He was quick, impulsive, fiery, big-hearted, [illegible], and magnetic. You could not resist his captivating manners. His heart and soul seemed to beam out of his eyes. They lighted up every lineament of his countenance. His voice was seductive and his manners captivating. A more generous man I have never met. He was worshiped by his mother and sister to whom he was most kind and most women fancied him. But there was one instance in which his attentions to one of that sex met with a [illegible words].

Howell and Booth Went a Mashing

He and I, as long as we roomed together, were inseparable companions. At the time we were rooming together he was suffering from a knife wound he had received from a jealous girl who had stabbed him because she had caught him flirting with another girl. [Note: Fellow actress Henrietta Irving stabbed JWB on April 26, 1861 after witnessing him come out of her sister’s hotel room] We both boarded at the house of a family named Brown. On our way we had to pass the establishment of a [illegible] who had a very pretty girl working for her. She was really a very beautiful girl. Baltimore was famed for its beautiful women, and I believe is still, but this girl was unusually lovely. Wilkes and I both became smitten with her. We got in the habit of passing the place very often, and ogling her. We would wait on the street until she came out, and follow her. Finally, Wilkes said to me, ‘Howell, her bright eye has me still. We must contrive some way to be introduced to her.’

She would look at [illegible words] gave [illegible words] very great amount [illegible words]. Acting on Booth’s hint I questioned an old gentleman who was a reporter on one of the Baltimore papers, who seemed to know nearly everyone in Baltimore. From him we learned her name and that she was in the habit of attending the Methodist Church where she sang in the choir. Of course we went to the church and waited after the service for her to come out. As she gracefully descended the stairs Booth whispered in my ears.

‘See where my love appears
Darting pale luster
Like the silver moon
Through her veil of sorrow.’

To our chagrin as she reached the foot of the stairs, a group of young men who were also standing there formed a circle about her and walked away with her like a special and privileged bodyguard. To make the matter all the worse as they went off with her down the street I heard them tittering at us.

The next morning’s mail brought us an anonymous letter, It was addressed to ‘J. Wilkes Booth & co’ it read thus:

‘Sirs: Your impudent attention to and constant following of Miss Blank has been observed by a number of her gentlemen friends who will give you what you richly deserve in case you persist in trying to force yourselves upon the lady’s presence. A word to the wise is sufficient. HER FRIENDS’

While neither of us were frightened at the note or its writers we came to the realization that our attentions were annoying to the lady herself and she might have inspired its having been written to us. Booth was as gallant as he was handsome, and he never intended to do anything to annoy a lady. Both of us saw her afterwards only in our dreams, except a single time when she happened to come to the theater where we were both playing. She was [illegible]ly dressed and sat in a very expensive box. We feasted on her beauty but never annoyed her by our attention. I was in love with her almost as much so as I was with Charlotte Cushman when the latter kissed me. But Miss Cushman was then old, although a very handsome woman, while the beautiful Baltimorean was barely more than a slip of a girl, just budding into womanhood.

After a Yankee Regiment

While Booth and I were rooming together he belonged to a Confederate organization, that sallied forth one night and captured a lot of cannon that were at St. Timothy’s College. These they brought to Brown’s back yard, where our boarding house was, and secreted them and held them in readiness to carry out on the York road and fire them on the famous New York Seventh Regiment. This regiment was expected to pass through Baltimore on its way from New York to Washington. Sometimes the Yankees got wind of the project. At any rate, the purpose of the Confederates was thwarted the Seventh Regiment of Gotham going around by way of Annapolis instead of coming through Baltimore.

It is my impression that all of the sons of Junius Brutus Booth were born in Maryland where he owned a farm. I believed that at one time it was his intention of making farmers of all of them, but two of them at least, Edwin and John Wilkes, would not suppress the histrionic genius they inherited from him. I believe that they buried him on the farm when he died. But no matter where he sleeps I hope he rests gently and peacefully. He was one of the grandest actors I ever saw and his two sons possessed [illegible] of great talent as he did. Of them I was most intimate with his son John Wilkes than with Edwin because Wilkes was about my own age and was [illegible words] and companion. [illegible sentence] Wilkes was going to raise a company in Harford County where his father’s farm was and among the youth with whom [illegible words], and I was to have been an officer of the company. Wilkes was to have been in the service of [illegible] of the Confederacy. While we were waiting [illegible words] from Richmond [illegible words] Federal troops took possession of Baltimore and thwarted our patriotic plans. Often I have pondered on what would have [illegible words] had we gone into the [illegible]. Whether we would have won the [illegible words] in gray uniforms or slumbered under the [illegible] of a battlefield? Poor Wilkes came to a terribly tragic end so I have thought it would have been better for him to have been slain in battle not killed as he was. I am not one of those who believes that Booth escaped after killing Lincoln. I am convinced Booth was pursued and killed by troops in the barn, and that identification of his body at the time was complete. I have often read the stories of his survival and alleged subsequent death thirty years later but I knew they were fictions because I was so intimate with John Wilkes Booth that I know if alive he would have found a way of communicating with me and I would have gone thousands of miles to have been with him once more.

Edwin Booth’s Trying Time

It was not a great while after the terrible tragedy that Edwin Booth had to undergo a trying ordeal. I was not with him then and I get my account of him from John Marion Barrow [Barron], himself an actor of great power, who frequently appeared in the same plays with and supported Edwin Booth. This was the first night that Edwin Booth appeared on the stage in Philadelphia after the death of Lincoln. The play was Othello. Booth was cast for the part of Iago, and Barrow that of Roderigo. [Note: John M. Barron was a small actor at the Walnut Street Theatre in Philadelphia when Edwin Booth returned there in April of 1866. He did support Edwin in Othello but he did not play the role of Roderigo]

‘Before the curtain arose,’ Barrow said, ‘I found Edwin Booth literally quaking in his boots. He was standing in the wings waiting for his cue. The orchestra was playing, and I stood next to him. I had never seen Edwin Booth appear nervous before. I could not help [illegible] his condition. He said to me ‘Barrow, I don’t know whether I am going to get bricks or roses tonight.’

I assured him as best I could, although I had some misgivings myself. I told him that the people of Baltimore [sic] held him in high esteem and did not hold him responsible for his mentally unbalanced brother. I assured him they were as staunchly loyal to him then as they were before that unlucky Friday night. We had but a few brief moments to wait, during which the tension was great on Edwin. The music ceased; the curtain rose. The cue came and I went on the stage, going to the right while speaking my lines. In a moment, Edwin Booth followed. If the vast audience had possessed but a single voice it could not have shouted in more perfect unison. The men waved their hats and the ladies their handkerchiefs. Both shouted a loyal welcome while flowers fairly rained upon the stage.

Booth stood in the center of the stage. He removed his hat as only he could do – while the showering of flowers continued. The audience cheered and cheered again. Finally, from exhaustion it subsided. Booth had nerved himself and was himself again. Never did he act so grandly. Gratitude made him magnificent. The play had been splendidly cast. ‘The performance, I think,’ said Barrow, ‘was the grandest that I ever appeared in and the best that Edwin Booth ever acted and participated in. I know I never saw him to better advantage than upon that night.’

Edwin Booth’s Liberality

In the last interview I told you the hard luck of Tim Murphy and his companions when the opera house in which they were to play in Arkansas burned. It was a humorous thing. Now I shall tell you one of the most pathetic ones. I do not wish to name the actors connected with it. It occurred in Logansport, Ind. There an unfortunate theatrical troupe had stranded. One of its principal members had died. They had no funds to bury him nor any with which to return to Chicago, from whence they came, and whence they wished to return. The same John Marion Barrow [Barron] to whom I have just alluded was then with Edwin Booth and the latter company in the same place. Barrow went around among the members of Booth’s company and from them obtained donations in the amount of $[illegible]. He called on Booth last. He said to him, ‘Ned I want $5 or if you can spare it, $10.’

Booth handed him the largest amount and then asked Barrow what he wanted with the money. Barrow told him he wanted it to bury the dead man with. He told Booth the amount he had raised and from whom. Booth then said ‘John, you give that money, every cent of it, back to the members of this company. They need every cent they have themselves. I insist on it. You leave this whole matter to me. Let me know what it will not only cost to bury the poor fellow, but also what it will take in addition to carry the whole company back to Chicago.

Barrow returned the money to the actors who had raised the $[illegible]. Edwin Booth buried the dead one at his own expense and sent the live ones home with lots of gratitude and blessings.

This reminds me that poor Billy Williams is ill and hard up here in San Antonio and the newspaper men and others are getting up a benefit for him. I have not been on the stage for many years, but I would be willing to go to aid him and I would give money, too, if I had it. I tell you, though, I am of the opinion that the people who ought to do most for Billy in this his hour of trouble are those at Memphis. I have been told that Williams, during the yellow fever plague that was a terrible visitation to that city, being at that time in good financial circumstances, gave the Memphians many thousands of dollars. This being the case, I think it the duty of Memphis people to come to his relief now. They could come across with a couple thousand dollars and ought to do it. If they let him die here in poverty as he is apt to, and [illegible] aid only from generous San Antonians, it will be a reproach on Memphis. I believe that if they knew the condition that Williams is in here they would hasten to his aid. I hope they will. [Note: William “Billy” Williams was a minstrel performer who gave a great deal of money to aid in a Yellow Fever epidemic that struck Memphis in 1879. At the time of this article Williams was in poor health and living in San Antonio. The locals did a benefit performance for him and he eventually made his way North before dying in 1910]

All actors have their sorrows. I have had my share of them. When but a very young man I married one of the most loveable women on earth. After bearing me two children, a boy and a girl – she died and left me alone with them to look after which I have done as best I could. Her death broke my heart. It made me leave our home that had been so happy. That was the cause of my coming to Texas and intimately to San Antonio, to get away from the scene of my sorrow. I left and wound up here. I worked even as a day laborer on a railway. Finally I became crippled and unable to do hard physical labor but even now, in my old age, I am not idle. I earn an honest living and am as cheerful as possible and am oftener seen smiling than frowning or grieving for I don’t care to force my thoughts on anyone else. I believe as a great poet says:

‘Laugh and the world laughs with you. Weep, and you weep alone.'”


As with most reminiscences, there is a fair amount of exaggeration and fiction in some of Howell’s stories regarding the Booths. But there are also some fascinating nuggets of truth in these memories of the assassin and his family. I especially appreciate Howell’s rebuttal of the “Booth escaped” stories that permeated Texas during his lifetime and beyond.

William Alexander Howell died in San Antonio on February 26, 1913. A member of the International Order of Odd Fellows for over 50 years, Howell was laid to rest in San Antonio’s IOOF cemetery. During a recent visit to San Antonio, I took the time to seek out Mr. Howell’s grave in the corner of the cemetery.

I’m grateful for William Howell’s memories of his time on the stage. While his stories need to be taken with a grain of salt, they still help us to flesh out the lives of John Wilkes, Edwin, and Joseph Booth. In appreciation, I’m going to end this post with a final Howell and Booth story.

On February 26, 1887, Edwin Booth made his first appearance in San Antonio. The celebrated actor performed a matinee of Richelieu followed by an evening performance of Hamlet. In the hours between his arrival in the city and the afternoon’s matinee, Edwin Booth did what everyone does when visiting San Antonio, he went to the Alamo where he “asked many questions” according to the papers. The later performances were well anticipated with ticket prices being raised for this one-time event.

Edwin was lauded by the San Antonians (though one critic thought Booth’s performance of Hamlet seemed a bit apathetic) and all were happy they managed to see the famous tragedian in what would surely be his only performance ever in the city. Booth, himself, complained of the struggle he had in the trip from San Antonio to the west coast making it seem a repeat performance would never occur. However, a year later, Booth was on tour once again. He needed funds for his fledgling social club, The Players. The group was looking to purchase a building somewhere in New York City. This need for money outweighed Edwin’s own discomforts in a national tour. As a result, he planned a return to Texas and scheduled two dates in San Antonio. This time Edwin was joined by fellow player Lawrence Barrett as a co-star. On February 22 and 23, 1888, the men performed in Othello and Julius Caesar. Prices were increased again with one newspaper lamenting, “It takes nearly ten dollars to take your girl to see Booth and Barrett tonight.” Still, the performances were completely sold out (though, again, critics felt that Booth may have been phoning it in). After these two dates, Edwin Booth departed San Antonio, never to be seen there again.

The reason I bring this all up is because there is an 1891 article that states while Booth and Barrett were in San Antonio they shared a dinner with their fellow veteran actor and friend, William Howell. According to the article the three men, “had a long chat…about the old times when they were all neophytes”. Then, according to the article, Edwin Booth stated to his host, “What a fool you were Howell not to have stuck to the stage. You would have been not only famous, but wealthy.” While the source of the article could only have been William Howell himself, I’m still willing to grant him the kindness of closing on the claim that Edwin Booth thought the veteran actor in San Antonio had the talent to have been a successful actor, worthy of the Boothenian name, after all.

Categories: History | Tags: , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Lincoln Assassination on this Day (December 12 – December 31)

Taking inspiration from one of my favorite books, John Wilkes Booth: Day by Day by Art Loux, I’ve been documenting a different Lincoln assassination or Booth family event each day on my Twitter account. If you click on any of the pictures in the tweet, it will take you to its individual tweet page on Twitter where you can click to make the images larger and easier to see. Since Twitter limits the number of characters you can type in a tweet, I often include text boxes as pictures to provide more information. I hope you enjoy reading about the different events that happened over the last week.

NOTE: After weeks of creating posts with multiple embedded tweets, this site’s homepage now tends to crash from trying to load all the different posts with all the different tweets at once. So, to help fix this, I’ve made it so that those viewing this post on the main page have to click the “Continue Reading” button below to load the full post with tweets. Even after you open the post in a separate page, it may still take awhile for the tweets to load completely. Using the Chrome browser seems to be the best way to view the tweets, but may still take a second to switch from just text to the whole tweet with pictures.

Continue reading

Categories: History, OTD | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.